The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The pharmacology and ionic dependency of amino acid responses in the frog spinal cord
Open accessAbstract
1. The isolated frog spinal cord was used to study the action of amino acids and their antagonists on primary afferent terminals and motoneurones. The direct effects of these substances were observed by bathing the cord in 20 m M magnesium sulphate (thus blocking synaptic transmission) and recording the polarization level of the dorsal and ventral roots. 2. γ‐Aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamic acid depolarized the dorsal root and reduced dorsal‐root potentials, while glycine produced only weak and variable effects. Glutamic acid also depolarized the ventral root; GABA usually produced either a hyperpolarization or had little effect, while glycine caused variable effects. 3. Bicuculline and picrotoxin antagonized all the synaptic potentials recorded on the dorsal root, as well as the GABA responses on both dorsal and ventral roots. 4. All the synaptic potentials examined remained and were markedly prolonged in the absence of external chloride except the ventral root‐dorsal root potential. Replacement of the physiologic complement of chloride during chloride‐free perfusion restored the potentials to their original time courses. 5. Depolarizing amino acid responses remained in the absence of external chloride, while hyperpolarizing responses were reversed into depolarizations. Return to normal Ringer solution re‐established the hyperpolarizations. 6. Removal of external sodium reversibly abolished the amino acid depolarizations but had little effect on the depolarizations in response to applications of high external potassium concentrations. 7. The results support the hypotheses (a) that GABA mediates presynaptic inhibition by depolarizing primary afferent terminals and (b) that the GABA‐mediated depolarization is sodium dependent. 8. The results also indicate that GABA utilizes different ionic mechanisms to mediate presynaptic inhibition (sodium) and post‐synaptic inhibition (chloride) in the amphibian (and presumably in the mammal).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Characteristics of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses in the Central Nervous System of the Cat
UCHIZONO, K. (1965) · Nature · doi:10.1038/207642a0 · Cited by 917
Electron microscopy of excitatory and inhibitory synapses: a brief review
Gray, E. G. (1969) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)63235-5 · Cited by 228
Cited by
Neurotransmitters decrease the calcium component of sensory neurone action potentials
DUNLAP, K., & FISCHBACH, G. D. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/276837a0 · Cited by 411
NISTRI, A., & CONSTANTI, A. (1979) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(79)90016-9 · Cited by 395
Burke, R. E., & Rudomin, P. (1977) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010124 · Cited by 276
Amino acid pharmacology of mammalian central neurones grown in tissue culture
Barker, J. L., & Ransom, B. R. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012387 · Cited by 265
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barker, J. L., & Nicoll, R. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1973-01
- Volume
- 228
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 259-277
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2139441209
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The pharmacology and ionic dependency of amino acid responses in the frog spinal cord. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010085
- The paper
- Barker, J. L., & Nicoll, R. A. (1973). The pharmacology and ionic dependency of amino acid responses in the frog spinal cord. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.