The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Separate channels for the analysis of the shape and the movement of a moving visual stimulus
Open accessAbstract
1. The effects of temporal modulation on the properties of spatial frequency channels have been investigated using adaptation. 2. Adapting to drifting sinusoidal gratings caused threshold elevation that was both spatial frequency and direction specific. Little systematic difference was found between the band widths of the elevation curves for drifting and stationary gratings. 3. It was confirmed that adaptation fails to reveal channels at low spatial frequencies when stationary gratings are used. However, channels were revealed at frequencies at least as low as 0·66 c/deg when the test gratings were made to move. These channels are adapted only a little by stationary gratings, confirming their dependence on movement. 4. The existence of movement‐sensitive channels at low spatial frequencies explains the well known observation that temporal modulation greatly increases the sensitivity of the visual system to low spatial frequencies. 5. Temporal modulation was effective at revealing these channels only when the flicker or movement of the test patterns was apparent to the observer; only at low spatial frequencies did patterns, modulated at low rates, actually appear to be temporarily modulated at threshold. At higher spatial frequencies, they were indistinguishable from stationary patterns until the contrast was some way above the detection threshold. 6. It is suggested, therefore, that the movement‐sensitive channels are responsible for signalling the occurrence of movement; the channels at higher spatial frequencies give no information about temporal changes. These two systems of channels are compared to the Y‐ and X‐cells respectively of the cat.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
Cited by
Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-11-03416.1987 · Cited by 1,758
Model of human visual-motion sensing
Watson, A. B., & Ahumada, A. J. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.000322 · Cited by 1,170
Psychophysical evidence for sustained and transient detectors in human vision
Kulikowski, J. J., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1973) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010261 · Cited by 690
Self-citationSpatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex.
Movshon, J. A., Thompson, I. D., & Tolhurst, D. J. (1978) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012490 · Cited by 667
Self-citationX and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys.
Kaplan, E., & Shapley, R. M. (1982) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014333 · Cited by 601
Metadata
- Authors
- Tolhurst, D. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1973-06
- Volume
- 231
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385-402
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2006051926
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.