The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ionic mechanism for the photoreceptor potential of the retina of Bufo marinus
Open accessAbstract
1. Membrane potentials were recorded from single rods in the isolated retina of Bufo marinus while the ionic composition of the extracellular medium was rapidly changed. Substitution of 2 m M aspartate− for Cl− produced a prompt depolarization of horizontal cells, but no modification of either resting potential or response to light in receptor cells. This implies that feed‐back from horizontal cells to receptor cells was not active. 2. During substitution of choline+ or Li+ for Na+, and during isosmotic substitution of sucrose for NaCl, the resting potential of receptor cells became more negative and responses to light were abolished. During exposure to K+‐free medium, the resting potential became slightly more negative and the responses to light became larger and developed small after‐depolarizations. Exposure to [K+]out of four times normal resulted in permanent diminution of response magnitude and permanent change of response waveshape. Removal of Mg 2+, four times normal [Mg 2+]out or substitution of methylsulphate− for Cl− had no effect on resting potential or responses to light. With the exception of the small effects seen with altered [K+]out these results are consistent with the receptor potential being generated by a light‐induced decrease of membrane conductance to Na+. 3. Exposure to decreased [Ca 2+]out caused both a depolarization of the receptor membrane in the dark and an increase in the magnitude of the maximal response that could be evoked by a test stimulus. The magnitude of the increase in response equalled the magnitude of the depolarization. Exposure to increased [Ca 2+]out or steady background light caused both a steady hyperpolarization and a decrease in the magnitude of the maximal response that could be evoked by a test stimulus. For steady hyperpolarizations greater than 3·5 mV, whether caused by elevated [Ca 2+]out or steady background light, the decrease in response magnitude exceeded the magnitude of the hyperpolarization. These results imply that externally applied Ca 2+ ions mimic the effects of steady background lights, but the applied Ca 2+ ions must do more than merely decrease membrane conductance to Na+.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bader, C. R., Bertrand, D., & Schwartz, E. A. (1982) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014372 · Cited by 388
(1987) · PubMed · Cited by 290
Lateral interactions in the outer retina
Thoreson, W. B., & Mangel, S. C. (2012) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2012.04.003 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. E., & Pinto, L. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1974-02
- Volume
- 236
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 575-591
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2040047419
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionic mechanism for the photoreceptor potential of the retina of Bufo marinus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010453
- The paper
- Brown, J. E., & Pinto, L. H. (1974). Ionic mechanism for the photoreceptor potential of the retina of Bufo marinus. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.