The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The response of laryngeal afferent fibres to mechanical and chemical stimuli
Open accessAbstract
1. We have recorded afferent activity from ‘single fibres’ dissected from the superior laryngeal nerve of anaesthetized cats. 2. Units which responded to gentle mechanical stimulation of the larynx epithelium were chosen for study. 3. Receptors with myelinated fibres were grouped according to their spontaneous activity. Group 1 fibres had little or no spontaneous activity: group 2 fibres had constant and continuous spontaneous activity. 4. Group 1 fibres had a wide range of adaptation rates. Their conduction velocities lay between 3·0 and 30 m/sec. The receptors were generally stimulated by ammonia and distilled water and often by CS riot control agent, 5 and 10% CO 2, 200 ppm SO 2, and cigarette smoke. Histamine, phenyl diguanide, graphite dust, 100 ppm SO 2 and saline drops did not generally excite the fibres. 5. Group 2 fibres were slowly adapting. Their conduction velocities ranged between 8·0 and 26·5 m/sec. Ammonia usually, and distilled water sometimes, excited these fibres while 5 and 10% CO 2 mixtures inhibited them. A minority of group 2 fibres were pH sensitive, inhibited by acids and stimulated by alkaline buffers. Cigarette smoke had complex actions, either excitation, inhibition or, at different times, both. Histamine, P.d.g., CS, SO 2, saline drops and dust had no action on these fibres. 6. Recordings were made from one unmyelinated fibre (conduction velocity 1·9 m/sec) which responded to stroking of the epithelium with a thread and to histamine, P.d.g. and ammonia vapour applied to the epithelium. 7. We consider the site, method of excitation and reflex actions of the different receptors described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME AND THE COUGH REFLEX
Morice, A., Brown, M., Lowry, R., & Higenbottam, T. (1987) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91547-9 · Cited by 746
Aviv, J. E., Sacco, R. L., Mohr, J. P., Thompson, J. L. P., Levin, B., Sunshine, S., Thomson, J., & Close, L. G. (1997) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/00005537-199709000-00018 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Boushey, H. A., Richardson, P. S., Widdicombe, J. G., & Wise, J. C. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1974-07
- Volume
- 240
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-175
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2020429627
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The response of laryngeal afferent fibres to mechanical and chemical stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010605
- The paper
- Boushey, H. A., Richardson, P. S., Widdicombe, J. G., & Wise, J. C. M. (1974). The response of laryngeal afferent fibres to mechanical and chemical stimuli. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.