The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Saccadic, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic eye movements of the trained cat.
Open accessAbstract
1. Cats were trained to track a small target by rewarding them for keeping their eyes on target. Eye movements were measured by the electromagnetic search coil technique. 2. Cat saccades are qualitatively similar to primate saccades, but exhibit more variability in their parameters. However, they have longer durations and lower maximum velocities than primate saccades. As in the monkey, the duration of the horizontal or vertical component of an oblique saccade is lengthened when the orthogonal component has a larger amplitude. Cat saccades can be modified in midflight like human saccades. Opening the visual feed‐back loop by controlling target position with eye position causes the cat to execute a staircase of equal amplitude saccades if a retinal error is present. Increasing the amount of visual feed‐back induces saccadic oscillations. 3. Horizontal smooth pursuit of a 0 . 5 deg visual target is limited to velocities of less than 1 deg/sec. However, moving an optokinetic background with the 0 . 5 deg target enables the cat to achieve higher horizontal smooth eye velocities of up to 8 . 5 deg/sec. Prolonged (10‐20 sec) constant velocity rotation of an optokinetic drum evokes horizontal slow‐phase velocities of up to 28 deg/sec. In response to vertical movements of the target and optokinetic background, smooth eye movements reached 6 deg/sec maximum upward velocities but only 2 . 5 deg/sec maximum downward velocities. Opening the feed back loop with no retinal error present causes the eye to exhibit a growing smooth trajectory. The response to a Rashbass step‐ramp target suggests that the feline smooth response is a function of target movement rather than displacement. 4. These data suggest that cat saccadic eye movements resemble those of primates while the cat smooth pursuit and optokinetically induced eye movements are more similar to those of the rabbit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The mechanics of human saccadic eye movement
Robinson, D. A. (1964) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007485 · Cited by 893
Cited by
Jürgens, R., Becker, W., & Kornhuber, H. H. (1981) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00336734 · Cited by 462
Present concepts of oculomotor organization
Büttner, U., & Büttner-Ennever, J. A. (2006) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(05)51001-x · Cited by 272
Effects of Saccades on the Activity of Neurons in the Cat Lateral Geniculate Nucleus
Lee, D., & Malpeli, J. G. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.922 · Cited by 91
Asymmetric retinal direction tuning predicts optokinetic eye movements across stimulus conditions
Harris, S. C., & Dunn, F. A. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.81780 · Cited by 21
Lackner, J. R., & DiZio, P. (1992) · The Head-Neck Sensory Motor System · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195068207.003.0033 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Evinger, C., & Fuchs, A. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-12
- Volume
- 285
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 209-229
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2144582350
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Saccadic, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic eye movements of the trained cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012568
- The paper
- Evinger, C., & Fuchs, A. F. (1978). Saccadic, smooth pursuit, and optokinetic eye movements of the trained cat. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012568
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.