Cited by 147Gastrointestinal motility and disordersCongenital gastrointestinal and neural anomaliesNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Reflex pathways in the abdominal prevertebral ganglia: evidence for a colo-colonic inhibitory reflex

Open access
Kreulen, D L, Szurszewski, J H·1979·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. In vitro experiments were performed on preparations consisting of prevertebral ganglia attached to the entire colon of guinea-pigs. The colon was divided into an orad and a caudad segment and intraluminal pressure was recorded from the terminal end of each segment. Intracellular recordings were simultaneously obtained from neurones in the coeliac plexus. 2. The source of mechanosensory input from the colon paralleled the responses to mesenteric nerve stimulation. That is, section of the mesenteric nerve that contributed the strongest synaptic input to a neurone eliminated most of the mechanosensory input to that neurone. 3. The origin of the mechanosensory input to some neurones could be localized as coming from either the orad or caudad segment of the colon. In the coeliac ganglia 68% of the neurones tested responded primarily to orad distension and 37% to caudad distension. In the superior mesenteric ganglion 57% responded to orad distension and 43% to caudad distension. 4. Repetitive stimulation of the mesenteric nerve trunks arising from the prevertebral ganglia inhibited contractions differentially in the orad and caudad segments. The inferior coeliac nerves inhibited primarily the orad segments of colon and the lumbar colonic nerves inhibited primarily the caudad segments of colon. Stimulation of the superior coeliac nerves did not alter the motility of either segment. 5. When one of the colonic segments was distended, contractions in the other colonic segment were i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012952

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prevertebral ganglia integrate visceral afferent information and participate in local reflex arcs, including inhibitory enteroenteric reflexes that coordinate activity across segments.

    “Prevertebral ganglia integrate visceral afferent information and participate in local reflex arcs, including inhibitory enteroenteric reflexes that coordinate activity across segments (Kreulen et al., 1979; Langley et al., 1895; Szurszewski et al., 1984) (Fig. 2).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 147

Authors
Kreulen, D. L., & Szurszewski, J. H.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-10
Volume
295
Issue
1
Pages
21-32
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1979177881
Cited by
147
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
prevertebral ganglia, superior mesenteric ganglion, colonic distension, mechanosensory input, colonic motility, guinea pig colon
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Celiac Plexus, Colon, Ganglia, Sympathetic, Gastrointestinal Motility, Guinea Pigs, Male, Mechanoreceptors, Mesentery, Neural Inhibition, Reflex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review