The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Selective depression of excitatory amino acid induced depolarizations by magnesium ions in isolated spinal cord preparations.
Open accessAbstract
1. The depressant actions of Mg2+ and a range of other divalent ions on synaptic excitation and on responses produced by excitatory amino acids and other putative transmitters have been investigated in hemisected isolated spinal cords of frogs and neonatal rats. Some comparative studies were also made using the rat isolated superior cervical ganglion. 2. At concentrations above 10 microM, Mg2+ selectively antagonized N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA)‐induced motoneurone depolarization as recorded from ventral roots of tetrodotoxin‐blocked spinal cords. Depolarization evoked by quisqualate (unaffected by 20 mM‐Mg2+) was resistant to the depressant action of these ions, while depolarizations evoked by other excitant amino acids were depressed to intermediate degrees. 3. Mn2+, Co2+ and Ni2+ had qualitatively similar actions to Mg2+; Mn2+ was somewhat less potent and Co2+ and Ni2+ more potent than Mg2+. The alkaline earth metal ions, Ca2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+, had very weak Mg2+‐like actions. Ca2+ and Mg2+ acted additively in depressing amino acid‐induced responses. 4. Mg2+ also depressed motoneurone responses evoked by noradrenaline, substance P and carbachol in the neonatal rat isolated spinal cord. However, none of these effects were as marked as the depression of NMDA‐induced responses by Mg2+ in this preparation. Mg2+ did not depress motoneurone depolarization produced by 5‐HT in the rat spinal cord or the depolarizing action of GABA on primary afferent terminals of the isolated frog spinal cord. 5. At concentrations producing marked depression of NMDA‐induced responses, Mg2+ also depressed synaptic transmission in spinal cords in the absence of an effect on ganglionic transmission. At the same concentrations, Mn2+, Co2+ and Ni2+ depressed synaptic transmission in both preparations. 6. From the similarity in action between Mg2+ and the D‐alpha‐aminoadipate group of NMDA antagonists, it is suggested that the central depressant action of low concentrations of Mg2+ involves predominantly a postsynaptically mediated interference with the action of an excitatory amino acid transmitter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MacDermott, A. B., Mayer, M. L., Westbrook, G. L., Smith, S. J., & Barker, J. L. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/321519a0 · Cited by 1,835
Ascher, P., & Nowak, L. (1988) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017078 · Cited by 819
Quantitative studies on some antagonists of N‐methyl D‐aspartate in slices of rat cerebral cortex
Harrison, N. L., & Simmonds, M. A. (1985) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1985.tb12922.x · Cited by 485
Receptors for the excitatory amino acids in the mammalian central nervous system
McLennan, H. (1983) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(83)90004-7 · Cited by 290
Dingledine, R. (1983) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014899 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Ault, B., Evans, R. H., Francis, A. A., Oakes, D. J., & Watkins, J. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-10
- Volume
- 307
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 413-428
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2121624942
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective depression of excitatory amino acid induced depolarizations by magnesium ions in isolated spinal cord preparations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013443
- The paper
- Ault, B., Evans, R. H., Francis, A. A., Oakes, D. J., & Watkins, J. C. (1980). Selective depression of excitatory amino acid induced depolarizations by magnesium ions in isolated spinal cord preparations. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.