The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An electrical tuning mechanism in turtle cochlear hair cells
Open accessAbstract
1. Intracellular recordings were made from single cochlear hair cells in the isolated half‐head of the turtle. The electrical responses of the cells were recorded under two conditions: (a) when the ear was stimulated with low‐intensity tones of different frequencies and (b) when current steps were injected through the intracellular electrode. The aim of the experiments was to evaluate the extent to which the cochlea's frequency selectivity could be accounted for by the electrical properties of the hair cells. 2. At low levels of acoustic stimulation, the amplitude of the hair cell's receptor potential was proportional to sound pressure. The linear tuning curve, which is defined as the sensitivity of the cell as a function of frequency when the cell is operating in its linear range, was measured for a number of hair cells with characteristic frequencies from 86 Hz to 425 Hz. 3. A rectangular current passed into a hair cell elicited a membrane potential change consisting of a damped oscillation superimposed on a step. Small currents produced symmetrical oscillations at the beginning and end of the pulse. Larger currents increased the initial ringing frequency if depolarizing and decreased it if hyperpolarizing. 4. For small currents the frequency of the oscillations and the quality factor (Q) of the electrical resonance derived from the decay of the oscillations were close to the characteristic frequency and Q of the hair‐cell linear tuning curve obtained from sound presentations. 5. The hair cell's membrane potential change to small‐current pulses or low‐intensity tone bursts could be largely described by representing the hair cell as a simple electrical resonator consisting of an inductance, resistor and capacitor. 6. When step displacements of 29‐250 nm were applied to a micropipette, placed just outside a hair cell in the basilar papilla, an initial periodic firing of impulses could be recorded from single fibres in the auditory nerve. Currents of up to 1 nA, injected through the same micropipette, failed to produce any change in the auditory nerve discharge. The experiment demonstrates that current injection does not produce gross movements of the electrode tip. 7. The contribution of the electrical resonance to hair‐cell tuning was assessed by dividing the linear tuning curve by the cell's impedance as a function of frequency. The procedure assumes that the electrical resonance is independent of other filtering stages, and on this assumption the resonance can account for the tip of the acoustical tuning curve. 8. The residual filter produced by the division was broad; it exhibited a high‐frequency roll‐off with a corner frequency at 500‐600 Hz, similar in all cells, and a low‐frequency roll‐off, with a corner frequency from 30 to 350 Hz which varied from cell to cell but was uncorrelated with the characteristic frequency of the cell. 9. The phase of the receptor potential relative to the sound pressure at the tympanum was measured in ten cells. For low intensities the phase characteristic was independent of the sound pressure. At low frequencies the receptor potential led the sound by 270‐360°, and in the region of the characteristic frequency there was an abrupt phase lag of 90‐180°; the abruptness of the phase change depended upon the Q of the cell. 10. The calculated phase shift of the electrical resonator as a function of frequency was subtracted from the phase characteristic of the receptor potential. The subtraction removed the sharp phase transition around the characteristic frequency, and in this frequency region the residual phase after subtraction was approximately constant at +180°. This is consistent with the idea that the hair cells depolarize in response to displacements of the basilar membrane towards the scala vestibuli. The high‐frequency region of the residual phase characteristic was similar in all cells. 11. It is concluded that each hair cell contains its own electrical resonance mechanism which accounts for most of the frequency selectivity of the receptor potential. All cells also show evidence of a broad band‐pass filter, the high frequency portion of which may be produced by the action of the middle ear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mechanical properties of ciliary bundles of turtle cochlear hair cells.
Crawford, A. C., & Fettiplace, R. (1985) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015750 · Cited by 512
Self-citationMECHANISMS OF HAIR CELL TUNING
Fettiplace, R., & Fuchs, P. A. (1999) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.809 · Cited by 417
Self-citationSound Detection and Processing by Fish: Critical Review and Major Research Questions (Part 1 of 2)
Popper, A. N., & Fay, R. R. (1993) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000113821 · Cited by 353
Voltage- and ion-dependent conductances in solitary vertebrate hair cells
Lewis, R. S., & Hudspeth, A. J. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/304538a0 · Cited by 342
The Physiology of Mechanoelectrical Transduction Channels in Hearing
Fettiplace, R., & Kim, K. X. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00038.2013 · Cited by 313
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Crawford, A. C., & Fettiplace, R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-03
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 377-412
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2044731337
- Cited by
- 423
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An electrical tuning mechanism in turtle cochlear hair cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013634
- The paper
- Crawford, A. C., & Fettiplace, R. (1981). An electrical tuning mechanism in turtle cochlear hair cells. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013634
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.