The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of orientation bias in cat retina
Open accessAbstract
1. Responses of cat retinal ganglion cells to a drifting sinusoidal grating stimulus were measured as a function of the grating orientation and spatial frequency. 2. The response at fixed frequency and contrast varied with orientation in the manner of a cosine function. A new measure was introduced to quantify this orientation bias in the response domain on an absolute scale of 0‐100%. Under experimental conditions designed to maximize the effect, the mean bias for 250 cells was 16% and the range was 0‐46%. In 70% of cells there was significant bias. 3. Orientation bias varied with spatial frequency and was maximal near the high‐frequency limit. The majority of biassed cells preferred the same orientation at high and low frequencies but in some cells a reversal occurred: the orientation which gave maximum response at high frequencies gave minimum response at low frequencies. The greatest variation of cut‐off frequency with orientation was ⅔ octave. 4. Orientation bias was due to neural, not optical, factors. Nevertheless, the phenomenon could often be imitated by deliberately introduced optical astigmatism of up to 4 dioptres for brisk‐sustained units and over 10 dioptres for brisk‐transient units. 5. The grating orientation preferred by cells varied systematically with position in the visual field. The central tendency was for the grating which yielded maximum response to lie parallel to the line joining the cell to the area centralis. This generalization failed for units within 2° of the centre of the area centralis. 6. Analysis of orientation bias indicates a functional asymmetry of receptive fields such that the centre mechanism, and sometimes also the surround mechanism, is elongated along the line joining cell to area centralis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
Cited by
Orientation Selectivity in Macaque V1: Diversity and Laminar Dependence
Ringach, D. L., Shapley, R. M., & Hawken, M. J. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-13-05639.2002 · Cited by 649
The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea
Toet, A., & Levi, D. M. (1992) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90227-a · Cited by 560
Bonds, A. B. (1989) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800004314 · Cited by 474
The spatial transformation of color in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey
Johnson, E. N., Hawken, M. J., & Shapley, R. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/86061 · Cited by 381
Centrifugal directional bias in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque
Albright, T. D. (1989) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800012037 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Levick, W. R., & Thibos, L. N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-08
- Volume
- 329
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 243-261
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2042317511
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.