Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Actions on gamma‐motoneurones elicited by electrical stimulation of group I muscle afferent fibres in the hind limb of the cat.

Open access
Appelberg, B, Hulliger, M, Johansson, H, Sojka, P·1983·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The reflex actions, elicited by graded electrical stimulation of hind‐limb muscle, skin and joint nerves were studied in an extended series of experiments in extra‐and intracellular recordings from 120 lumbar gamma‐motoneurones of cats anaesthetized with chloralose. The present report deals with the action of group I muscle afferent fibres, which was examined in ninety‐five gamma‐cells. Of the gamma‐cells 83% were classified as either static or dynamic by stimulation in the mesencephalic area for dynamic control. The general responsiveness (i.e. number of input nerves with effect/number of input nerves tested) of the cells was very high (89.9%). The responsiveness to stimulation of group I muscle afferent fibres was extremely low, both in flexor and extensor gamma‐motoneurones and irrespective of whether they were static or dynamic. There was no difference, as regards the low incidence of group I muscle reflex action, between stimulation of autogenetic and heteronymous nerves. Among the rare reflex effects elicited from group I muscle fibres inhibition was four times as frequent as excitation. Inhibitory effects could be provoked from the autogenetic as well as from the heteronymous nerves. In contrast, excitatory effects were almost always autogenetic. The scarcity of group I muscle action on gamma‐motoneurones is in striking contrast to the well known and powerful reflex actions of Ia and Ib fibres on alpha‐motoneurones. These findings are discussed in relation to the concept of alpha‐gamma linkage, and it is concluded that skeletomotor and fusimotor activity cannot be rigidly linked under all conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014531

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Appelberg, B., Hulliger, M., Johansson, H., & Sojka, P.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-02
Volume
335
Issue
1
Pages
237-253
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2111911520
Cited by
290
References
1
FWCI
13.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Actions on gamma‐motoneurones elicited by electrical stimulation of group I muscle afferent fibres in the hind limb of the cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014531
The paper
Appelberg, B., Hulliger, M., Johansson, H., & Sojka, P. (1983). Actions on gamma‐motoneurones elicited by electrical stimulation of group I muscle afferent fibres in the hind limb of the cat. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014531

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.