The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Actions on gamma‐motoneurones elicited by electrical stimulation of group I muscle afferent fibres in the hind limb of the cat.
Open accessAbstract
The reflex actions, elicited by graded electrical stimulation of hind‐limb muscle, skin and joint nerves were studied in an extended series of experiments in extra‐and intracellular recordings from 120 lumbar gamma‐motoneurones of cats anaesthetized with chloralose. The present report deals with the action of group I muscle afferent fibres, which was examined in ninety‐five gamma‐cells. Of the gamma‐cells 83% were classified as either static or dynamic by stimulation in the mesencephalic area for dynamic control. The general responsiveness (i.e. number of input nerves with effect/number of input nerves tested) of the cells was very high (89.9%). The responsiveness to stimulation of group I muscle afferent fibres was extremely low, both in flexor and extensor gamma‐motoneurones and irrespective of whether they were static or dynamic. There was no difference, as regards the low incidence of group I muscle reflex action, between stimulation of autogenetic and heteronymous nerves. Among the rare reflex effects elicited from group I muscle fibres inhibition was four times as frequent as excitation. Inhibitory effects could be provoked from the autogenetic as well as from the heteronymous nerves. In contrast, excitatory effects were almost always autogenetic. The scarcity of group I muscle action on gamma‐motoneurones is in striking contrast to the well known and powerful reflex actions of Ia and Ib fibres on alpha‐motoneurones. These findings are discussed in relation to the concept of alpha‐gamma linkage, and it is concluded that skeletomotor and fusimotor activity cannot be rigidly linked under all conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Where Does Sherrington's "Muscular Sense" Originate? Muscles, Joints, Corollary Discharges?
Matthews, P. B. C. (1982) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.05.030182.001201 · Cited by 319
Cited by
Lundberg, A., Malmgren, K., & Schomburg, E. D. (1987) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00236299 · Cited by 362
Dynamic Knee Stability: Current Theory and Implications for Clinicians and Scientists
Williams, G. N., Chmielewski, T., Rudolph, K. S., Buchanan, T. S., & Snyder-Mackler, L. (2001) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2001.31.10.546 · Cited by 274
On the function of muscle and reflex partitioning
Windhorst, U., Hamm, T. M., & Stuart, D. G. (1989) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00024985 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Appelberg, B., Hulliger, M., Johansson, H., & Sojka, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 335
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 237-253
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2111911520
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Actions on gamma‐motoneurones elicited by electrical stimulation of group I muscle afferent fibres in the hind limb of the cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014531
- The paper
- Appelberg, B., Hulliger, M., Johansson, H., & Sojka, P. (1983). Actions on gamma‐motoneurones elicited by electrical stimulation of group I muscle afferent fibres in the hind limb of the cat. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014531
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.