Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of potassium dynamics in mammalian brain tissue.

Open access
Gardner‐Medwin, A R·1983·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Equations are derived for potassium (K+) dynamics in simplified models of brain tissue. These describe K+ movement in extracellular space, transfer of K+ associated with current flow through cells (the so‐called spatial buffer mechanism) and equilibration between extracellular space and cytoplasm. Numerical calculations show that the principal data on K+ dynamics from various laboratories can be accounted for with simple assumptions about spatial buffer action and uptake. Much of the data is inconsistent with extracellular diffusion being the main mechanism for K+ flux through brain tissue, including some that has earlier been cited in support of this hypothesis. The buffering actions of spatial buffer transfer of K+ and of cytoplasmic equilibration, in which these mechanisms reduce rises of [K+]o that would otherwise occur, are analysed quantitatively for specific K+ source distributions and for spatial and temporal frequency components of general disturbances. Spatial buffer action has most effect in reducing [K+]o rises with net release over extensive zones of tissue (greater than ca. 200 micron in diameter) for periods of the order of minutes. Reductions greater than 75% may be achieved. With localized but prolonged release, the maximum [K+]o rise is little affected but the volume of tissue affected by more moderate rises is substantially reduced. Cytoplasmic K+ uptake also has most effect with widespread release, but its effect diminishes with prolonged periods of release. The effects of the buffering mechanisms and of K+ re‐uptake into active neurones in determining the decline of [K+]o after a period of stimulation are considered. Re‐uptake is unlikely to be the major factor responsible for [K+]o decline when this has a time course of only a few seconds. The properties necessary for the cells mediating the spatial buffer mechanisms, possibly glial cells, are assessed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014541

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Gardner‐Medwin, A. R.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-02
Volume
335
Issue
1
Pages
393-426
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2153662862
Cited by
282
References
1
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of potassium dynamics in mammalian brain tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014541
The paper
Gardner‐Medwin, A. R. (1983). Analysis of potassium dynamics in mammalian brain tissue. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014541

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.