The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of potassium dynamics in mammalian brain tissue.
Open accessAbstract
Equations are derived for potassium (K+) dynamics in simplified models of brain tissue. These describe K+ movement in extracellular space, transfer of K+ associated with current flow through cells (the so‐called spatial buffer mechanism) and equilibration between extracellular space and cytoplasm. Numerical calculations show that the principal data on K+ dynamics from various laboratories can be accounted for with simple assumptions about spatial buffer action and uptake. Much of the data is inconsistent with extracellular diffusion being the main mechanism for K+ flux through brain tissue, including some that has earlier been cited in support of this hypothesis. The buffering actions of spatial buffer transfer of K+ and of cytoplasmic equilibration, in which these mechanisms reduce rises of [K+]o that would otherwise occur, are analysed quantitatively for specific K+ source distributions and for spatial and temporal frequency components of general disturbances. Spatial buffer action has most effect in reducing [K+]o rises with net release over extensive zones of tissue (greater than ca. 200 micron in diameter) for periods of the order of minutes. Reductions greater than 75% may be achieved. With localized but prolonged release, the maximum [K+]o rise is little affected but the volume of tissue affected by more moderate rises is substantially reduced. Cytoplasmic K+ uptake also has most effect with widespread release, but its effect diminishes with prolonged periods of release. The effects of the buffering mechanisms and of K+ re‐uptake into active neurones in determining the decline of [K+]o after a period of stimulation are considered. Re‐uptake is unlikely to be the major factor responsible for [K+]o decline when this has a time course of only a few seconds. The properties necessary for the cells mediating the spatial buffer mechanisms, possibly glial cells, are assessed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dietzel, I., Heinemann, U., Hofmeier, G., & Lux, H. D. (1980) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00236151 · Cited by 357
Cited by
Spreading Depression, Spreading Depolarizations, and the Cerebral Vasculature
Ayata, C., & Lauritzen, M. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2014 · Cited by 555
Diffusion and related transport mechanisms in brain tissue
Nicholson, C. (2001) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/64/7/202 · Cited by 490
Role of glial cells in the regulation of the brain ion microenvironment
Walz, W. (1989) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0301-0082(89)90005-1 · Cited by 444
Olsen, M. L., & Sontheimer, H. (2008) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05615.x · Cited by 323
Astrogliosis: An integral player in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease
Osborn, L. M., Kamphuis, W., Wadman, W. J., & Hol, E. M. (2016) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.01.001 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardner‐Medwin, A. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-02
- Volume
- 335
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 393-426
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2153662862
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of potassium dynamics in mammalian brain tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014541
- The paper
- Gardner‐Medwin, A. R. (1983). Analysis of potassium dynamics in mammalian brain tissue. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014541
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.