The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The responses of cells in macaque lateral geniculate nucleus to sinusoidal gratings.
Open accessAbstract
Responses of cells in the parvocellular (p.c.l.) and magnocellular (m.c.l.) layers of the macaque lateral geniculate nucleus to sine‐wave gratings were studied. Both p.c.l. and m.c.l. cells responded best at a temporal frequency (drift rate) of 10‐20 Hz. P.c.l. cells responded at temporal frequencies lower than 1 Hz; m.c.l. cells did not. With coloured‐ or white‐black luminance‐modulated gratings, responses of m.c.l. cells were weaker at low than at medium spatial frequencies. With coloured gratings, p.c.l. cell responses were not attenuated at low spatial frequencies. With white gratings a few p.c.l. cells did show such attenuation. Optimal responses from p.c.l. cells were obtained with coloured gratings; white gratings evoked weaker responses. With a grating of a colour causing suppression of a p.c.l. cell's activity, the modulation of firing was much less than with a grating of a colour excitatory for the cell. M.c.l. on‐ and off‐centre cells responded equally well to moving gratings. The ability of p.c.l. cells to resolve fine gratings was dependent on cell type as well as on the colour of grating used. The ability of m.c.l. cells to resolve fine gratings was comparable to that of p.c.l. cells. The contrast sensitivity of m.c.l. cells was much higher than that of p.c.l. cells. This may account for their ability to resolve fine gratings, despite their larger centre size. In comparison with luminance‐modulated gratings, chromatically modulated gratings could evoke larger or smaller responses, depending on p.c.l. cell type and the colours in the grating. M.c.l. cells responded poorly or not at all.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat
Enroth-Cugell, C., & Robson, J. G. (1966) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008107 · Cited by 2,625
DISCHARGE PATTERNS AND FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MAMMALIAN RETINA
Kuffler, S. W. (1953) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1953.16.1.37 · Cited by 2,609
Cited by
Segregation of Form, Color, Movement, and Depth: Anatomy, Physiology, and Perception
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3283936 · Cited by 3,355
Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1987) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.07-11-03416.1987 · Cited by 1,758
How parallel are the primate visual pathways?
Merigan, W. H., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1993) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002101 · Cited by 1,597
The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity.
Kaplan, E., & Shapley, R. M. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.8.2755 · Cited by 732
Boussaoud, D., Ungerleider, L. G., & Desimone, R. (1990) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902960311 · Cited by 634
Metadata
- Authors
- Hicks, T. P., Lee, B. B., & Vidyasagar, T. R.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 337
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 183-200
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1988719733
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The responses of cells in macaque lateral geniculate nucleus to sinusoidal gratings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014619
- The paper
- Hicks, T. P., Lee, B. B., & Vidyasagar, T. R. (1983). The responses of cells in macaque lateral geniculate nucleus to sinusoidal gratings. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.