Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developmental onset of long‐term potentiation in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus.

Open access
Harris, K M, Teyler, T J·1984·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Long‐term potentiation (l.t.p.) was studied in area CA1 of rat hippocampal slices during development at post‐natal days 1‐8, 15 and 60. Tetanic stimulation at 100 Hz for 1 s was delivered to the fibres in stratum radiatum and the time course of potentiation was recorded in stratum pyramidale for 20 min after tetanus. L.t.p. was measured at 20 min post‐tetanus as an increase in the amplitude of the population spike. The time course and magnitude of post‐tetanic potentiation (p.t.p.) differed with age. For 60‐day‐old animals p.t.p. was seen as a maximally potentiated response immediately post‐tetanus that declined to a smaller potentiated response by 5 min post‐tetanus. For animals younger than 15 days the response was also maximally potentiated immediately post‐tetanus with subsequent decline. However, the duration of maximal potentiation was shorter and the magnitude was less. A different time course of p.t.p. was observed at 15 days. The maximal potentiation was approximately equal to that seen at 60 days, but instead of declining, the response remained maximally potentiated throughout the entire post‐tetanus monitoring period. L.t.p. was first observed at post‐natal day 5, and by post‐natal days 7 and 8 substantial levels of l.t.p. were seen consistently. The greatest magnitude of l.t.p. was found at 15 days, and was considerably more than that produced at 60 days. When the duration of l.t.p. was monitored for longer than 20 min the response declined back to pretetanus levels by 1‐1 1/2 h for animals younger than 15 days. In 15‐day‐old rats the response remained maximally potentiated for the full 72 min that it was monitored, with no decline. In control experiments of low‐frequency stimulation (l.f.s.) at 1/15 s for 100 stimuli, hippocampal slices from 60‐day‐old animals showed response elevation. In contrast, l.f.s. resulted in response decrement over time for slices from 5‐15‐day‐old animals. Three measures of pretetanus excitability in area CA1 suggested an increase with age. The stimulus intensity required for field excitatory post‐synaptic potential (e.p.s.p.) threshold declined, the magnitude of the maximal population spike amplitude increased, and the population spike latency decreased. These results suggest that the magnitude of l.t.p. is not strictly related to the pretetanus excitability of CA1 cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Harris, K. M., & Teyler, T. J.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-01
Volume
346
Issue
1
Pages
27-48
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2079133060
Cited by
249
References
1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Developmental onset of long‐term potentiation in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015005
The paper
Harris, K. M., & Teyler, T. J. (1984). Developmental onset of long‐term potentiation in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.