Cited by 66Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Trigeminal‐baroreceptor reflex interactions modulate human cardiac vagal efferent activity.

Open access
Eckberg, D L, Mohanty, S K, Raczkowska, M·1984·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Instantaneous levels of vagal cardiac inhibition reflect integrated responses of vagal motonuclei to multiple sensory neural inputs. We studied how two of these inputs, from trigeminal cutaneous receptors and carotid arterial baroreceptors interact to influence human vagal cardiac outflow. Nine healthy young men voluntarily maintained breathing rates and tidal volumes within narrow limits. Carotid baroreceptors were stimulated with brief periods of moderate neck suction. Volunteers were studied prone, breathing through a snorkel, before and during face immersion in cold water, and before and after an intravenous injection of a very low dose of atropine sulphate (which increases vagal cardiac efferent activity in dogs). Face immersion raised blood pressure slightly, increased heart period, and augmented baroreflex bradycardia and respiratory sinus arrhythmia significantly. Low‐dose atropine together with face immersion further augmented blood pressure, heart period, baroreflex responses and sinus arrhythmia. These results suggest that one input to the central nervous system (from trigeminal cutaneous receptors) which increases vagal cardiac outflow, augments vagal responses to another input (from arterial baroreceptors). Since the initial pathways of these two inputs are anatomically separate, it is likely that the influences of respiration and low doses of atropine on vagal motonuclei are exerted down‐stream from the termination of primary trigeminal and baroreceptor afferent fibres.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under ordinary circumstances, decreases in high-frequency heart rate variability indicate decreased parasympathetic and increased sympathetic activation.

    “Under ordinary circumstances, HF decreases indicate decreased parasympathetic and increased sympathetic activation [36, 48, 49]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eckberg, D. L., Mohanty, S. K., & Raczkowska, M.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-02
Volume
347
Issue
1
Pages
75-83
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1985864072
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
carotid baroreceptors, baroreflex bradycardia, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, cold water, atropine, neck suction, heart period, skin receptors, autonomic integration
MeSH terms
Adult, Arrhythmia, Sinus, Atropine, Carotid Arteries, Electrocardiography, Humans, Immersion, Male, Motor Neurons, Pressoreceptors, Reflex, Respiration, Skin, Trigeminal Nerve, Vagus Nerve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review