The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fictive locomotion in the lamprey spinal cord in vitro compared with swimming in the intact and spinal animal.
Open accessAbstract
A comparison has been made of the patterns of muscle activity during swimming in the intact and spinal lamprey, and the patterns of ventral root activity in the in vitro preparation of the lamprey spinal cord. Electromyographic (e.m.g.) activity was recorded with intramuscular bipolar electrodes from three segmental levels in intact lampreys swimming in a swim‐mill at a range of swimming speeds. The patterns of activity obtained were similar to those seen in elasmobranch and teleost fish. After high spinal transection, lampreys could be induced to swim continuously for a period of several minutes in the swim‐mill by a light initial mechanical stimulation of the tail or dorsal fin. The patterns of e.m.g. activity obtained from spinal animals at a range of swimming speeds were similar to those obtained in the intact state. Portions of spinal cord were isolated encompassing those segments from which e.m.g. recordings had been made and ventral root recordings were made in vitro of the rhythmic activity induced by bath application of D‐glutamate. In all experiments the mean duration of the bursts of activity at any segmental level was directly proportional to the mean cycle duration, and the constant of proportionality (about 0.36) was similar for all three types of preparation. In all preparations the mean time delay for the activation of segments in the rostral‐caudal direction was proportional to the cycle duration and to the number of segments between recording positions. The proportionality constant, or phase lag per segment, was approximately equal to 0.01 in all three types of preparation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neurobiological Bases of Rhythmic Motor Acts in Vertebrates
Grillner, S. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3975635 · Cited by 1,080
Central Pattern Generators for Locomotion, with Special Reference to Vertebrates
Grillner, S., & Wallén, P. (1985) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.08.030185.001313 · Cited by 836
Self-citationCurrent principles of motor control, with special reference to vertebrate locomotion
Grillner, S., & El Manira, A. (2020) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00015.2019 · Cited by 560
Neural networks that co-ordinate locomotion and body orientation in lamprey
Grillner, S., Deliagina, T., El Manira, A., Hill, R. H., Orlovsky, G. N., Wallén, P., Ekeberg, Ö., & Lansner, A. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)80008-p · Cited by 451
Self-citationProprioceptive Coupling within Motor Neurons Drives C. elegans Forward Locomotion
Wen, Q., Po, M. D., Hulme, E., Chen, S., Liu, X., Kwok, S. W., Gershow, M., Leifer, A. M., Butler, V., Fang-Yen, C., et al. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.039 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallén, P., & Williams, T. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 347
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 225-239
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2095427020
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fictive locomotion in the lamprey spinal cord in vitro compared with swimming in the intact and spinal animal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015063
- The paper
- Wallén, P., & Williams, T. L. (1984). Fictive locomotion in the lamprey spinal cord in vitro compared with swimming in the intact and spinal animal. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.