The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non‐selective conductance in calcium channels of frog muscle: calcium selectivity in a single‐file pore.
Open accessAbstract
Voltage‐clamp studies were carried out to compare currents through Ca2+ channels (ICa) with Na+ currents (Ins) through a non‐selective cation conductance blocked by micromolar concentrations of external Ca2+. The gating of both currents was found to have similar time and voltage dependence. The amplitudes of ICa and Ins varied widely, but Ins was always large in fibres with large ICa, and small in fibres with small ICa. Both ICa and Ins were blocked by the specific Ca2+ channel blocker nifedipine, with half‐blockage concentrations that were virtually identical (KD = 0.9 microM for ICa and 0.7 microM for Ins). ICa and Ins were also equally sensitive to block by diltiazem (KD = 80 microM). These parallels between Ins and ICa are most easily explained if Ins flows through Ca2+ channels. Apparently, Ca2+ channels bear high‐affinity Ca2+‐binding sites, and are highly permeable to monovalent cations when Ca2+ is absent. Ba2+ currents (IBa) and ICa were measured in external solutions containing mixtures of Ba2+ and Ca2+. IBa is blocked by Ca2+, as is Ins. Adding Ba2+ to Ca2+ produces only small or no increases in current, as if Ba2+ is only sparingly permeant when Ca2+ is present. Membrane currents in Ba2+/Ca2+ mixtures show anomalous mole‐fraction behaviour, suggesting that Ca2+ channels are single‐file, multi‐ion pores. Complex current transients are observed under maintained depolarizations in Na+/Ca2+ and Ba2+/Ca2+ mixtures. They suggest that in ion mixtures, Ca2+ channels transport Ca2+ in preference to Na+ and Ba2+. Hence Ca2+ channels are selective for Ca2+, even though current amplitudes suggest that the Na+ or Ba2+ permeabilities in the absence of Ca2+ are as high as, or higher than, the Ca2+ permeability. We conclude that the selective permeability of Ca2+ channels depends on the presence of Ca2+. In model calculations, our observations are explained as a consequence of Ca2+ channels being single‐file pores. It is proposed that Ca2+ channels derive much of their ion selectivity from high‐affinity Ca2+ binding sites located in an otherwise unselective aqueous pore.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cation selective glass electrodes and their mode of operation
Eisenman, G. (1962) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(62)86959-8 · Cited by 852
Cited by
Store-Operated Calcium Channels
Prakriya, M., & Lewis, R. S. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00020.2014 · Cited by 1,239
Bormann, J., Hamill, O. P., & Sakmann, B. (1987) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016493 · Cited by 1,157
Calcium Absorption Across Epithelia
Hoenderop, J. G. J., Nilius, B., & Bindels, R. J. M. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2004 · Cited by 936
Mayer, M. L., & Westbrook, G. L. (1987) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016883 · Cited by 931
Molecular identification of the CRAC channel by altered ion selectivity in a mutant of Orai
Yeromin, A. V., Zhang, S. L., Jiang, W., Yu, Y., Safrina, O., & Cahalan, M. D. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05108 · Cited by 817
Metadata
- Authors
- Almers, W., & McCleskey, E. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-08
- Volume
- 353
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 585-608
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1990154764
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non‐selective conductance in calcium channels of frog muscle: calcium selectivity in a single‐file pore. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015352
- The paper
- Almers, W., & McCleskey, E. W. (1984). Non‐selective conductance in calcium channels of frog muscle: calcium selectivity in a single‐file pore. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1984.sp015352
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.