Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Predictive velocity estimation in the pursuit reflex response to pseudo‐random and step displacement stimuli in man.

Open access
Barnes, G R, Donnelly, S F, Eason, R D·1987·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Eye movements have been recorded in man in response to various forms of continuous and discontinuous target motions in the horizontal plane in an attempt to establish the mechanisms of prediction in the pursuit reflex. 2. In an initial experiment the target motion was composed of four sinusoids, each of peak velocity +/‐ 3.3 deg/s. The three lowest frequencies (0.11, 0.24 and 0.37 Hz) remained constant whereas the highest frequency (F4) was varied from 0.39 to 2.08 Hz. When F4 was 0.39 Hz, all frequency components had a high level of eye velocity gain (mean 0.92) but as F4 was increased there was a significant (P less than 0.001) decline in gain for all three low frequencies which reached a minimum (mean 0.53) when F4 was 1.56 Hz. However, the gain for F4 always remained at a high level, comparable to that evoked by a discrete frequency sinusoid of the same frequency. 3. When the highest‐frequency sinusoid was replaced by a square wave of identical amplitude a similar decline in gain for the low frequencies was observed. Eye velocity exhibited a quasi‐sinusoidal modulation at the frequency of the square wave even though the rapid steps did not constitute a suitable stimulus to the visual velocity feed‐back mechanisms. 4. When only two sinusoids were mixed to form the pursuit stimulus a similar break‐down in gain of the lower‐frequency component was observed which reached a minimum (mean gain 0.58) when F2 was between 1 and 2 Hz. This implies that the predictability of stimulus motion is dependent, not on the complexity of the stimulus, but on its highest‐frequency component. 5. Presentation of square‐wave target displacements alone confirmed that smooth eye movements could be evoked by such a stimulus. Eye velocity was at a maximum between 1.0 and 1.5 Hz and was predictive of ensuing target displacement. Responses to staircase step sequences of varying duration indicated that prediction was based on an assessment of the duration of the preceding sequence. 6. Tachistoscopic presentation of targets during low‐frequency sinusoidal oscillation indicated that illumination of the target for very short periods (10‐320 ms) as few as two times per cycle during minimum velocity phases enhanced the perception of continuous movement. A predictive eye movement was evoked with a high level of peak velocity which then decayed until the subsequent exposure of the target.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016649

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Barnes, G. R., Donnelly, S. F., & Eason, R. D.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-08
Volume
389
Issue
1
Pages
111-136
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2099400085
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive velocity estimation in the pursuit reflex response to pseudo‐random and step displacement stimuli in man. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016649
The paper
Barnes, G. R., Donnelly, S. F., & Eason, R. D. (1987). Predictive velocity estimation in the pursuit reflex response to pseudo‐random and step displacement stimuli in man. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016649

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.