Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Opioid actions on single nucleus raphe magnus neurons from rat and guinea‐pig in vitro.

Open access
Pan, Z Z, Williams, J T, Osborne, P B·1990·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Intracellular recordings were made from neurons of the nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) from rat (n = 128) and guinea‐pig (n = 115). Two types of cells were found in each, primary (103 in rat, 27 in guinea‐pig) and secondary cells (25 in rat, 88 in guinea‐pig). 2. Primary cells had input resistances of 186 +/‐ 9 M omega (n = 9) in rat and 255 +/‐ 50 M omega (n = 11) in guinea‐pig. The action potential in each was about 1.5 ms in duration. Synaptic potentials were evoked by focal electrical stimulation and consisted of both gamma‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) and excitatory amino acid components. 3. Morphine, [Met5]enkephalin (ME) and [D‐Ala2,N‐Me‐Phe4, Gly5‐ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) depressed the amplitude of the GABA‐mediated synaptic potential by a maximum of 50‐65% and had little effect on the excitatory amino acid‐mediated synaptic potential. There was no effect of these opioids on the resting membrane potential or input resistance of primary cells in rat or guinea‐pig. 4. Secondary cells had short duration action potentials (less than 1 ms) and an input resistance of 354 +/‐ 47 M omega in rat (n = 6) and 290 +/‐ 40 M omega in guinea‐pig (n = 15). The synaptic potential observed in the cells of this group was mediated by activation of only excitatory amino acid receptors. 5. ME hyperpolarized and/or abolished the spontaneous firing in sixteen out of twenty‐four neurons in the secondary group from rat and eight out of eighty‐four neurons from guinea‐pig. ME induced an outward current at ‐60 mV that reversed polarity at potentials more negative than ‐92 +/‐ 3 mV in rat (n = 6) and ‐98 +/‐ 2 mV in guinea‐pig (n = 18). The reversal potential of the opioid current was shifted to less negative potentials when the external potassium concentration was increased, as predicted by the Nernst equation. 6. The morphology of the two types of cells were distinguishable in that primary cells were oval (29 x 18 microns in rat; 36 x 19 microns in guinea‐pig) with two to four thick tapering dendrites that branched within 50 microns of the cell body. Secondary cells were generally round or oval (about 24 x 13 microns in rat; 27 x 17 microns in guinea‐pig) with two to five thin non‐tapering dendrites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018185

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Pan, Z. Z., Williams, J. T., & Osborne, P. B.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-08
Volume
427
Issue
1
Pages
519-532
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1994397235
Cited by
202
References
0
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opioid actions on single nucleus raphe magnus neurons from rat and guinea‐pig in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018185
The paper
Pan, Z. Z., Williams, J. T., & Osborne, P. B. (1990). Opioid actions on single nucleus raphe magnus neurons from rat and guinea‐pig in vitro. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018185

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.