Cited by 51Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Morphine actions on supraoptic oxytocin neurones in anaesthetized rats: Tolerance after i.c.v. morphine infusion

Open access
Pumford, K M, Leng, G, Russell, J A·1991·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The effects of acute i.v. administration of morphine on putative oxytocin neurones of the supraoptic nucleus were studied in urethane-anaesthetized female rats which had been exposed to i.c.v. infusion of morphine (up to 50 micrograms h-1) or vehicle for 5 days. 2. In vehicle-infused rats, i.v. morphine inhibited the spontaneous activity of six out of seven putative oxytocin neurones. Increasing doses of morphine were given, from 1 microgram kg-1 to 5 mg kg-1. The median cumulative threshold dose to produce significant inhibition was 20 micrograms kg-1 (seven cells in six rats); six out of seven cells were inhibited at 161 micrograms kg-1. The highest doses tested inhibited by approximately 90% (excluding one unaffected cell). Inhibition was fully reversed by i.v. naloxone without overshoot, indicating a lack of acute dependence. 3. Injection of morphine i.c.v. inhibited firing at doses that were ineffective by i.v. injection and the effects of i.c.v. morphine were reversed by i.v. naloxone. 4. Acute morphine (500 micrograms kg-1 i.v.) reduced the plasma concentration of oxytocin, measured after 15 min by specific radioimmunoassay, by 34% (n = 14). 5. In lactating rats i.c.v. injection of morphine (1-2 micrograms) inhibited the activity of supraoptic neurones identified as oxytocinergic by their responses to suckling. 6. In seventeen rats infused with i.c.v. morphine the initial firing rate of twenty-eight spontaneously active, non-phasic neurones was significantly less, by 24%, than thirty-four similar cells in control rats, indicating incomplete tolerance to i.c.v. morphine. Morphine (up to 161 micrograms kg-1 given i.v.) inhibited none of nine active non-phasic neurones (P less than 0.01 compared to control rats), but at higher doses inhibited four of nine cells; the overall median threshold cumulative dose (1660 micrograms kg-1) was significantly greater than in vehicle-infused controls, indicating tolerance to i.v. morphine. In contrast with control rats, some cells (5/9) were modestly excited by low doses of morphine. Naloxone (5 mg kg-1 i.v.) produced withdrawal excitation: the firing rate of putative oxytocin neurones increased to approximately 260% of the pre-i.v. morphine value, indicating dependence in mechanisms regulating the firing rate of these neurones. 7. In morphine-infused rats, the basal firing rate of nineteen phasically active, putative vasopressin supraoptic neurones was not different in nineteen phasic cells in controls (6.4 +/- 0.7 vs. 4.2 +/- 0.6 Hz). 8. Thus morphine potently inhibits the firing of magnocellular oxytocin neurones in the female rat, inhibiting oxytocin secretion. Morphine tolerance and dependence develop during i.c.v. infusion of morphine for 5 days. Similar tolerance to and dependence upon endogenous opioids during pregnancy may be important in the preparation of oxytocin neurones for parturition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018717

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Opioids suppress the functional activity of oxytocin neurons via opioid action on their cell bodies in the hypothalamus.

    “Opioids not only inhibit OT release from the axon terminal in the posterior pituitary but also suppress the functional activity of OT neurons via opioid action on their cell bodies in the hypothalamus (23, 24).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 51

Authors
Pumford, K. M., Leng, G., & Russell, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
ORCID
Leng, G
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-08
Volume
440
Issue
1
Pages
437-454
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2035885331
Cited by
51
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
morphine, oxytocin neurons, supraoptic nucleus, naloxone, morphine tolerance, plasma oxytocin, lactation, suckling, neuronal firing rate, opioid receptor desensitization, female rats, dose-response threshold, spontaneous neuronal activity, opioid analgesia
MeSH terms
Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Tolerance, Electrophysiology, Female, Infusions, Parenteral, Morphine, Neurons, Oxytocin, Rats, Inbred Strains, Supraoptic Nucleus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review