The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors.
Open accessAbstract
1. We have undertaken a theoretical analysis of the steps contributing to the phototransduction cascade in vertebrate photoreceptors. We have explicitly considered only the activation steps, i.e. we have not dealt with the inactivation reactions. 2. From the theoretical analysis we conclude that a single photoisomerization leads to activation of the phosphodiesterase (PDE) with a time course which approximates a delayed ramp; the delay is contributed by several short first‐order delay stages. 3. We derive a method for extracting the time course of PDE activation from the measured electrical response, and we apply this method to recordings of the photoresponse from salamander rods. The results confirm the prediction that the time course of PDE activation is a delayed ramp, with slope proportional to light intensity; the initial delay is about 10‐20 ms. 4. We derive approximate analytical solutions for the electrical response of the photoreceptor to light, both for bright flashes (isotropic conditions) and for single photons (involving longitudinal diffusion of cyclic GMP in the outer segment). The response to a brief flash is predicted to follow a delayed Gaussian function of time, i.e. after an initial short delay the response should begin rising in proportion to t2. Further, the response‐intensity relation is predicted to obey an exponential saturation. 5. These predictions are compared with experiment, and it is shown that the rising phase of the flash response is accurately described over a very wide range of intensities. We conclude that the model provides a comprehensive description of the activation steps of phototransduction at a molecular level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Responses of retinal rods to single photons.
Baylor, D. A., Lamb, T. D., & Yau, K. W. (1979) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012716 · Cited by 992
Self-citation
Cited by
Destexhe, A., Mainen, Z. F., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1994) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/bf00961734 · Cited by 623
Slowed recovery of rod photoresponse in mice lacking the GTPase accelerating protein RGS9-1
Chen, C.-K., Burns, M. E., He, W., Wensel, T. G., Baylor, D. A., & Simon, M. I. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35000601 · Cited by 527
The Cone-specific visual cycle
Wang, J.-S., & Kefalov, V. J. (2011) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2010.11.001 · Cited by 335
Pugh, E. N., & Lamb, T. D. (2000) · Handbook of Biological Physics · doi:10.1016/s1383-8121(00)80008-1 · Cited by 324
Self-citationStevenson, R. A., Zemtsov, R. K., & Wallace, M. T. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/a0027339 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamb, T. D., & Pugh, E. N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 449
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 719-758
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2134950472
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019111
- The paper
- Lamb, T. D., & Pugh, E. N. (1992). A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.