Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Kinetic analysis of two types of Na+ channels in rat dorsal root ganglia.

Open access
Ogata, N, Tatebayashi, H·1993·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. The gating properties of two types of Na+ channels were studied in neurones isolated from rat dorsal root ganglia using the whole cell variation of the patch electrode voltage‐clamp technique. 2. Two types of Na+ currents (INa) were identified on the basis of their sensitivity to tetrodotoxin (TTX). One type was insensitive to TTX (up to 0.1 mM), while the other type was blocked by 1 nM of TTX. Whereas they were both insensitive to 50 microM Cd2+, a high concentration (2 mM) of Co2+ selectively inhibited the TTX‐insensitive type. 3. The activation thresholds were about ‐60 and ‐40 mV for the TTX‐sensitive and the TTX‐insensitive INa, respectively. Activation of the TTX‐sensitive INa developed with a sigmoidal time course which was described by m3 kinetics, whereas the activation of the TTX‐insensitive INa was described by a single exponential function. A deactivation process, as measured by the tail current upon repolarization, followed an exponential decay in either type of INa. 4. The rate constant of activation indicated that under comparable membrane potential conditions, the TTX‐insensitive channels open 4‐5 times slower than the TTX‐sensitive ones upon depolarization. Likewise, the rate constant of inactivation indicated that the TTX‐insensitive channels inactivate 3‐7 times more slowly than the TTX‐sensitive ones upon repolarization. 5. The steady‐state activation curve for the TTX‐insensitive INa was shifted about 20 mV in the positive direction from that for the TTX‐sensitive INa. 6. The steady‐state inactivation curve for the TTX‐insensitive INa as obtained with a 0.5 s prepulse was shifted about 26 mV in the positive direction from that for the TTX‐sensitive INa, indicating a greater availability for the TTX‐insensitive INa in depolarized membrane. However, on increasing the duration of prepulse, the inactivation curve for the TTX‐insensitive INa, but not for the TTX‐sensitive INa, shifted in the negative direction due to an extremely slow inactivation process in the TTX‐insensitive INa. Consequently, an overlap between the activation and inactivation curves which causes a steady influx of Na+ (window current) became progressively reduce. 7. The time course of INa decay was best described by a single exponential process in either the TTX‐sensitive or TTX‐insensitive INa, whereas the development of inactivation and the recovery from inactivation, which were measured by a conventional double‐pulse protocol, followed a second order process in either channel type.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019706

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Ogata, N., & Tatebayashi, H.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-07
Volume
466
Issue
1
Pages
9-37
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1503163429
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetic analysis of two types of Na+ channels in rat dorsal root ganglia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019706
The paper
Ogata, N., & Tatebayashi, H. (1993). Kinetic analysis of two types of Na+ channels in rat dorsal root ganglia. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019706

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.