Cited by 74Ion channel regulation and functionNerve injury and regenerationIon Channels and Receptors

Mitogenic factors regulate ion channels in Schwann cells cultured from newborn rat sciatic nerve.

Open access
Wilson, G F, Chiu, S Y·1993·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

1. Patch clamp studies were carried out in Schwann cells cultured from newborn rat sciatic nerve to determine the effects of mitogens on voltage-gated currents without the confounding influences of axonal contact and myelin present in vivo. The relevance of the various Schwann cell currents to proliferation was assessed using assays of [3H]thymidine incorporation. 2. Treatment of cultured Schwann cells with known mitogens, namely axon fragments (AF), myelin fragments (MF), or glial growth factor in combination with forskolin (GGF+F), increased the magnitudes of delayed rectifying potassium (K+) and sodium (Na+) currents. 3. In both control and mitogen-treated cells, the magnitude of net outward current paralleled clearly the magnitude of the cells' proliferative response. 4. The K+ channel-blocking quaternary ammonium ions, tetrabutylammonium (TBuA), tetrapentylammonium (TPeA) and tetrahexylammonium (THeA), but not the Na+ channel blocker tetrodotoxin (TTX), reduced proliferation in a dose-dependent fashion offering further evidence for a role for K+ channels in Schwann cell proliferation. 5. Voltage-gated chloride (Cl-) currents were observed in both control and mitogen-treated cells. Addition of the Cl- channel blockers, 4-acetamido-4'-isocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulphonate (SITS) or 4,4'-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulphonate (DIDS), to the culture media enhanced proliferation. 6. The possible intermediary role of the Schwann cell resting potential was explored in ion substitution experiments by increasing the K+ concentration of the media and by adding ouabain. Both manipulations inhibited Schwann cell mitosis. 7. Comparison of the expression of functional ion channels in vitro with that previously described for Schwann cells in vivo suggests a difference in the Schwann cell response to the membrane fragment mitogens and their intact counterparts in regard to the regulation of ion channels. MF up-regulates the number of functional channels, whereas the elaboration of myelin (or a factor related to its presence) in vivo appears to down-regulate channel expression, at the cell soma of myelinating Schwann cells. In addition, axonal contact may be required for normal expression of functional inwardly rectifying K+ channels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019872

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depolarizing the cell membrane halts G1/S progression in glia, Schwann cells, lymphocytes, V79 Chinese hamster lung cells, C1300 mouse neuroblastoma cells, and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells.

    “For example, depolarizing the cell membrane halts G1/S progression in glia (Canady et al., 1990), Schwann cells (Wilson and Chiu, 1993), lymphocytes (Price et al., 1989; Freedman et al., 1992; Wang et al., 1992), V79 Chinese hamster lung cells (Sachs et al., 1974), C1300 mouse neuroblastoma cells (Boonstra et al., 1981), and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells (Wonderlin et al., 1995).”

    From Membrane potential and cancer progression (2013) · cites this paper as Wilson and Chiu, 1993

  • Membrane hyperpolarization at the G1/S checkpoint is generally required for S phase initiation.

    “A number of studies suggest that membrane hyperpolarization at the G1/S checkpoint is generally required for S phase initiation.”

    From Membrane potential and cancer progression (2013) · cites this paper as Wilson and Chiu, 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, G. F., & Chiu, S. Y.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-10
Volume
470
Issue
1
Pages
501-520
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2050877691
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS23375, R01NS023375)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
Schwann cells, mitogens, ion channels, Schwann cell proliferation, delayed rectifier potassium current, sodium current, inwardly rectifying potassium channels, glial growth factor, forskolin, tetrabutylammonium, tetrodotoxin, satellite image time series, DIDS, resting membrane potential, ouabain, myelination, sciatic nerve
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Autoradiography, Axons, Cell Division, Cell Membrane, Cells, Cultured, Electrophysiology, Ion Channels, Mitogens, Myelin Sheath, Schwann Cells, Sciatic Nerve, Potassium Channels, Ion Channel Gating, Up-Regulation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Chloride Channels, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review