The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanical determinants of gradient walking energetics in man.
Abstract
1. The metabolic cost and the mechanical work at different speeds during uphill, level and downhill walking have been measured in four subjects. 2. The mechanical work has been partitioned into the internal work (W(int)), due to the speed changes of body segment with respect to the body centre of mass (BCM), and the external work (W(ext)), related to the position and speed changes of the BCM in the environment. 3. W(ext) has been further divided into a positive part W+ext) and a negative one (W‐(ext)), associated with the energy increases and decreases, respectively, over the stride period. 4. For all constant speeds the most economical gradient has been found to be ‐10.2% (+/‐ 0.8 S.D.). 5. At each gradient there is a unique W+ext/W‐ext ratio (= 1 in level walking), regardless of speed, with a tendency for W‐ext and W+ext to vanish above +15% and below ‐15% gradient, respectively. 6. W(int) is constant at each speed regardless of gradient. This is partly explained by an only slight decrease in stride frequency at increasing gradient. W(int) constancy implies that it has no role in determining the optimum gradient. 7. A linear multiple regression relating W+ext and W‐ext to the metabolic cost at different gradients showed that negative (eff‐) and positive (eff+) efficiencies decrease with increasing speed (from 0.912 to 0.726, and from 0.182 to 0.146, respectively). The eff‐/eff+ ratio, however, remains rather constant (4.995 +/‐ 0.125 S.D.). 8. We conclude that the measured W(ext), the W+ext/W‐ext partitioning and eff‐/eff+ ratio, i.e. the different efficiency of the muscles used as force and brake generators, can explain the metabolic optimum gradient at about ‐10%.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, the validity of existing explanations for the substantial differences in walking economy observed across different surface gradients (3,8,49,54,56) is largely unknown.”
From Walking economy is predictably determined by speed, grade, and gravitational load. (2017) · cites this paper as [54]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Energy cost of walking and running at extreme uphill and downhill slopes
Minetti, A. E., Moia, C., Roi, G. S., Susta, D., & Ferretti, G. (2002) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01177.2001 · Cited by 624
Self-citationBiomechanical and physiological aspects of legged locomotion in humans
Saibene, F., & Minetti, A. E. (2003) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-002-0654-9 · Cited by 437
Self-citationExternal, Internal and Total Work in Human Locomotion
Willems, P. A., Cavagna, G. A., & Heglund, N. C. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.198.2.379 · Cited by 405
Walking economy is predictably determined by speed, grade, and gravitational load.
Ludlow, L. W., & Weyand, P. G. (2017) · Journal of applied physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00504.2017 · Cited by 47
Jobe, R. T., & White, P. S. (2009) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01108.x · Cited by 32
A human-centered GIS approach to modeling mobility on southern baffin island, nunavut, canada
ten Bruggencate, R. E., Stup, J. P., Milne, S. B., Stenton, D. R., Park, R. W., & Fayek, M. (2016) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00934690.2016.1234897 · Cited by 17
Jessup, L. N., Kelly, L. A., Cresswell, A. G., & Lichtwark, G. A. (2023) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00349.2023 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Minetti, A. E., Ardigò, L. P., & Saibene, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 472
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 725-735
- ISSN
- 0022-3751
- 1469-7793
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review