The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue: evidence for suboptimal output from the motor cortex.
Open accessAbstract
1. Voluntary activation of elbow flexor muscles can be optimal during brief maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs), although central fatigue, a progressive decline in the ability to drive the muscle maximally, develops during sustained or repeated efforts. We stimulated the motor cortex and motor point in human subjects to investigate motor output during fatigue. 2. The increment in force (relative to the voluntary force) produced by stimulation of the motor point of biceps brachii increased during sustained isometric MVCs of the elbow flexors. Motoneuronal output became suboptimal during the contraction, i.e. central fatigue developed and accounted for a small but significant loss of maximal voluntary force. During 3 min MVCs, voluntary activation of biceps fell to an average of 90.7% from an average of > 99%. 3. The increment in force (relative to the voluntary force) produced by magnetic cortical stimulation was initially small (1.0%) but also increased during sustained MVCs to 9.8% (with a 2 min MVC). Thus, cortical output was not optimal at the time of stimulation nor were sites distal to the motor cortex already acting maximally. 4. A sphygmomanometer cuff around the upper arm blocked blood supply to brachioradialis near the end of a sustained MVC and throughout subsequent brief MVCs. Neither maximal voluntary force nor voluntary activation recovered during ischaemia after the sustained MVC. However, fatigue‐induced changes in EMG responses to magnetic cortical stimulation recovered rapidly despite maintained ischaemia. 5. In conclusion, during sustained MVCs, voluntary activation becomes less than optimal so that force can be increased by stimulation of the motor cortex or the motor nerve. Complex changes in excitability of the motor cortex also occur with fatigue, but can be dissociated from the impairment of voluntary activation. We argue that inadequate neural drive effectively ‘upstream’ of the motor cortex must be one site involved in the genesis of central fatigue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. I: Paresis and soft tissue changes
Gracies, J. (2005) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.20284 · Cited by 658
Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region: effect and possible mechanisms
Hodges, P. W., & Moseley, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/s1050-6411(03)00042-7 · Cited by 649
Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses
Hunter, S. K. (2014) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/apha.12234 · Cited by 595
Neural Contributions to Muscle Fatigue: From the Brain to the Muscle and Back Again
TAYLOR, J. L., AMANN, M., DUCHATEAU, J., MEEUSEN, R., & RICE, C. L. (2016) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000000923 · Cited by 543
Self-citationSt Clair Gibson, A., & Noakes, T. D. (2004) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2003.009852 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Gandevia, S. C., Allen, G. M., Butler, J. E., & Taylor, J. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-01-15
- Volume
- 490
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 529-536
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1971990609
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue: evidence for suboptimal output from the motor cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021164
- The paper
- Gandevia, S. C., Allen, G. M., Butler, J. E., & Taylor, J. L. (1996). Supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue: evidence for suboptimal output from the motor cortex. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.