The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences between outward currents of human atrial and subepicardial ventricular myocytes.
Open accessAbstract
1. Outward currents were studied in myocytes isolated from human atrial and subepicardial ventricular myocardium using the whole‐cell voltage clamp technique at 22 degrees C. The Na+ current was inactivated with prepulses to ‐40 mV and the Ca2+ current was eliminated by both reducing extracellular [Ca2+] to 0.5 mM and addition of 100 microM CdCl2 to the bath solution. 2. In human myocytes, three different outward currents were observed. A slowly inactivating sustained outward current, I(so), was found in atrial but not ventricular myocytes. A rapidly inactivating outward current, I(to), of similar current density was observed in cells from the two tissues. An additional uncharacterized non‐inactivating background current of similar size was observed in atrial and in ventricular myocytes. 3. I(to) and I(so) could be differentiated in atrial myocytes by their different kinetics and potential dependence of inactivation, and their different sensitivities to block by 4‐amino‐pyridine, suggesting that two individual channel types were involved. 4. In atrial cells, inactivation of I(to) was more rapid and steady‐state inactivation occurred at more negative membrane potentials than in ventricular cells. Furthermore, the recovery of I(to) from inactivation was slower and without overshoot in atrial myocytes. In addition, 4‐aminopyridine‐induced block of I(to) was more efficient in atrial than in ventricular cells. These observations suggest that the channels responsible for atrial and ventricular I(to) were not identical. 5. We conclude that the differences in outward currents substantially contribute to the particular shapes of human atrial and ventricular action potentials. The existence of I(so) in atrial cells only provides a clinically interesting target for anti‐arrhythmic drug action, since blockers of I(so) would selectively prolong the atrial refractory period, leaving ventricular refractoriness unaltered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
O'Hara, T., Virág, L., Varró, A., & Rudy, Y. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002061 · Cited by 1,196
Human Atrial Action Potential and Ca 2+ Model: Sinus Rhythm and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Grandi, E., Pandit, S. V., Voigt, N., Workman, A. J., Dobrev, D., Jalife, J., & Bers, D. M. (2011) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.111.253955 · Cited by 365
ter Keurs, H. E. D. J., & Boyden, P. A. (2007) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00011.2006 · Cited by 356
Wettwer, E., Hála, O., Christ, T., Heubach, J. F., Dobrev, D., Knaut, M., Varró, A., & Ravens, U. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000145155.60288.71 · Cited by 289
Self-citationMechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias
Tse, G. (2016) · Journal of Arrhythmia · doi:10.1016/j.joa.2015.11.003 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Amos, G. J., Wettwer, E., Metzger, F., Li, Q., Himmel, H. M., & Ravens, U.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-02-15
- Volume
- 491
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-50
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2020598747
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences between outward currents of human atrial and subepicardial ventricular myocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021194
- The paper
- Amos, G. J., Wettwer, E., Metzger, F., Li, Q., Himmel, H. M., & Ravens, U. (1996). Differences between outward currents of human atrial and subepicardial ventricular myocytes. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.