Cited by 86Birth, Development, and HealthPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesReproductive Physiology in Livestock

Placental glucose transport in growth-restricted pregnancies induced by overnourishing adolescent sheep

Open access
Wallace, J. M, Bourke, D. A, Aitken, R. P, Milne, J. S, Hay, W. W·2003·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Glucose clamp procedures were used to determine whether the slowing of fetal growth during the final third of gestation in overnourished adolescent ewes is due to a reduction in placental glucose transport capacity. Singleton pregnancies to a single sire were established by embryo transfer and thereafter adolescent dams were offered a high (n = 11) or moderate (n = 7) nutrient intake. Studies were conducted at 130 +/- 0.5 days gestation. Uterine and umbilical blood flows were studied by the steady-state transplacental diffusion technique and glucose fluxes quantified by the Fick principle. To determine the relationship between the transplacental glucose gradient and umbilical (fetal) glucose uptake, studies were conducted with maternal arterial glucose clamped at 5 micromol ml(-1) and fetal glucose at spontaneously occurring and two additional higher levels. Maternal body weight gain during gestation averaged 282 and 57 g day(-1) for high- and moderate-intake dams, respectively. Total placentome weight (209 +/- 23 vs. 386 +/- 34 g) and fetal weight (3072 +/- 266 vs. 4670 +/- 196 g) were lower (P < 0.001) in high- than in moderate-intake groups. The growth-restricted pregnancies in the high-intake dams were associated with reduced uterine (P < 0.05) and umbilical (P < 0.02) blood flows and, in the non-perturbed state, the fetuses were relatively hypoxic (2.1 vs. 3.0 micromol ml(-1), P < 0.05) and hypoglycaemic (0.90 vs. 1.31 micromol ml(-1), P < 0.002). Linear regression analysis of umbilical glucose uptake at three steady-state uterine-umbilical arterial transplacental plasma glucose concentration gradients revealed that absolute placental glucose transport capacity was lower in high- than in moderate-intake dams (mean slope, 0.8 vs. 1.5 dl min(-1), P < 0.05; and mean intercept, 1.84 vs. 3.40 micromol ml(-1)). However, glucose transfer capacity was not different between the two groups when expressed on a placental weight-specific basis. This confirms that the small size of the placenta per se is the major limitation to placental glucose transfer in the overnourished adolescent pregnant sheep.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.023333

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variations in maternal nutritional state have little effect on oxygen consumption by the ovine utero-placental tissues.

    “Variations in maternal nutritional state have little effect on oxygen consumption by the ovine utero-placental tissues (99,148,190,554).”

    From Placental Origins of Chronic Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [554]

  • In overnourished obese adolescent ewes, there is no evidence for a change in the placental glucose transfer capacity, despite feto-placental growth restriction, as placental glucose consumption and transfer vary normally with maternal glucose concentrations on a weight-specific basis.

    “Similarly, in overnourished obese adolescent ewes, there is no evidence for a change in the placental glucose transfer capacity, despite feto-placental growth restriction, as placental glucose consumption and transfer vary normally with maternal glucose concentrations on a weight-specific basis (554).”

    From Placental Origins of Chronic Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [554]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 86

Authors
Wallace, J. M., Bourke, D. A., Aitken, R. P., Milne, J. S., & Hay, W. W.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-08-23
Volume
547
Issue
1
Pages
85-94
ISSN
0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138368478
Cited by
86
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD028794, HD-28794, HD20761)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Keywords
placental glucose transport, fetal growth restriction, maternal overnutrition, glucose clamp, umbilical blood flow, uterine blood flow, fetal hypoxia, maternal nutrient intake, sheep pregnancy, embryo transfer, gestational age
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Hypoglycemia, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Oxygen, Placenta, Placental Insufficiency, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Umbilical Cord, Uterus, Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review