Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensory and electrophysiological properties of guinea‐pig sensory neurones expressing Nav 1.7 (PN1) Na+ channel α subunit protein

Open access
Djouhri, Laiche, Newton, Richard, Levinson, Simon Rock, Berry, Carol M., Carruthers, Barbara, Lawson, Sally N.·2003·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The TTX‐sensitive Na v 1.7 (PN1) Na+ channel α subunit protein is expressed mainly in small dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurones. This study examines immunocytochemically whether it is expressed exclusively or preferentially in nociceptive primary afferent DRG neurones, and determines the electrophysiological properties of neurones that express it. Intracellular somatic action potentials (APs) evoked by dorsal root stimulation were recorded in L6/S1 DRG neurones at 30 ± 2 °C in vivo in deeply anaesthetised young guinea‐pigs. Each neurone was classified, from its dorsal root conduction velocity (CV) as a C‐, Aδ‐ or Aα/β‐fibre unit and from its response to mechanical and thermal stimuli, as a nociceptive, low threshold mechanoreceptive (LTM) or unresponsive unit. Fluorescent dye was injected into the soma and Na v 1.7‐like immunoreactivity (Na v 1.7‐LI) was examined on sections of dye‐injected neurones. All C‐, 90 % of Aδ‐ and 40 % of Aα/β‐fibre units, including both nociceptive and LTM units, showed Na v 1.7‐LI. Positive units included 1/1 C‐LTM, 6/6 C‐nociceptive, 4/4 C‐unresponsive (possible silent nociceptive) units, 5/6 Aδ‐LTM (D hair), 13/14 Aδ‐nociceptive, 2/9 Aα/β‐nociceptive, 10/18 Aα/β‐LTM cutaneous and 0/9 Aα/β‐muscle spindle afferent units. Overall, a higher proportion of nociceptive than of LTM neurones was positive, and the median relative staining intensity was greater in nociceptive than LTM units. Na v 1.7‐LI intensity was clearly positively correlated with AP duration and (less strongly) negatively correlated with CV and soma size. Since nociceptive units tend overall to have longer duration APs, slower CVs and smaller somata, these correlations may be related to the generally greater expression of Na v 1.7 in nociceptive units.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.026559

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Djouhri, L., Newton, R., Levinson, S. R., Berry, C. M., Carruthers, B., & Lawson, S. N.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
546
Issue
2
Pages
565-576
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2020926989
Cited by
215
References
1
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.