The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyperthermia: a failure of the motor cortex and the muscle
Abstract
Fatigue is increased during hyperthermia, and torque declines more rapidly in sustained maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs). This can be caused by a greater decline in voluntary activation of muscle (i.e. ‘central fatigue’). The present study aimed to localize the site of failure of voluntary drive during hyperthermia. Seven subjects made brief (2–3 s) and sustained (2 min) MVCs of elbow flexor muscles in two experiments. Core temperature was normal (∼37°C) in the first experiment, and elevated (∼38.5°C) by passive heating in the second. During some MVCs, transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex (TMS) was delivered, and the evoked torque (superimposed twitch) and EMG responses were measured. During hyperthermia, voluntary torque was reduced by ∼2.4% during brief MVCs (P= 0.03), and decreased further (∼12%) during sustained MVCs (P= 0.01). The superimposed twitch amplitude in the sustained MVC was ∼50% larger (P= 0.01). Thus, the ability to drive the muscle maximally in a sustained fashion was decreased, and some motor cortical output, which could have increased torque, remained untapped by voluntary drive. The additional central fatigue was not associated with altered motor cortical ‘excitability’, as EMG responses produced by TMS were similar at the two temperatures. However, the peak relaxation rate of muscle increased by ∼20% (P= 0.005) during hyperthermia. Hence, faster motor unit firing rates would be required to produce fusion of force. The increased central fatigue during hyperthermia may represent a failure of descending voluntary drive to compensate for changed muscle properties, despite the availability of additional cortical output.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellular mechanisms of muscle fatigue
Fitts, R. H. (1994) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1994.74.1.49 · Cited by 1,537 · cited 1×
“…the ability to produce muscle force or power (e.g. Gandevia et al. 1995), and is largely caused by processes within the muscle, such as disturbances in excitation–contraction coupling and accumulation of metabolites (i.e. ‘peripheral fatigue’; for reviews see Fitts, 1994; Allen & Westerblad, 2001).”
Background
Cited by
Skeletal muscle fatigue: cellular mechanisms
Allen, D. G., Lamb, G. D., & Westerblad, H. (2008) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00015.2007 · Cited by 2,495
Dishman, R. K., Berthoud, H., Booth, F. W., Cotman, C. W., Edgerton, V. R., Fleshner, M. R., Gandevia, S. C., Gomez‐Pinilla, F., Greenwood, B. N., Hillman, C. H., et al. (2006) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2006.46 · Cited by 958
Self-citationSawka, M. N., Leon, L. R., Montain, S. J., & Sonna, L. A. (2011) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100082 · Cited by 470
Tucker, R., Marle, T., Lambert, E. V., & Noakes, T. D. (2006) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2005.101733 · Cited by 332
Nybo, L. (2008) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00910.2007 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Todd, G., Butler, J. E., Taylor, J. L., & Gandevia, S. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-21
- Volume
- 563
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 621-631
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W1607653731
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.