Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Opposing role of synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors in regulation of the extracellular signal‐regulated kinases (ERK) activity in cultured rat hippocampal neurons

Open access
Ivanov, Anton, Pellegrino, Christophe, Rama, Sylvain, Dumalska, Iryna, Salyha, Yuriy, Ben‐Ari, Yehezkel, Medina, Igor·2006·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The extracellular signal‐regulated kinases (ERK) signalling cascade is a key pathway that mediates the NMDA receptor (NMDAR)‐dependent neuronal plasticity and survival. However, it is not clear yet how NMDARs regulate ERK activity. Stimulation of the NMDARs induces a complex modification of ERK that includes both ERK activation and inactivation and depends on particular experimental conditions. Here we show that there exists a differential restriction in the regulation of ERK activity that depends on the pool of NMDAR that was activated. The synaptic pool of NMDARs activates ERK whereas the extrasynaptic pool does not; on the contrary, it triggers a signalling pathway that results in the inactivation of ERK. As a result, simultaneous activation of both extrasynaptic and synaptic NMDAR using bath application of NMDA or glutamate (a typical protocol explored in the majority of studies) produced ERK activation that depended on the concentration of agonists and was always significantly weaker than those mediated by synaptic NMDARs. Since the activation of the extrasynaptic NMDA is attributed mainly to global release of glutamate occurring at pathological conditions including hypoxic/ischaemic insults, traumas and epileptic brain damage, the reported differential regulation of ERK cascade by NMDARs provides a unique mechanism for an early identification of the physiological and/or pathophysiological consequences of NMDAR activation. The negative regulation of the ERK activity might be one of the first signalling events determining brain injury and constitutes a putative target of new pharmacological applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.105510

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Ivanov, A., Pellegrino, C., Rama, S., Dumalska, I., Salyha, Y., Ben‐Ari, Y., & Medina, I.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04-21
Volume
572
Issue
3
Pages
789-798
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1487630095
Cited by
319
References
4
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opposing role of synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors in regulation of the extracellular signal‐regulated kinases (ERK) activity in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.105510
The paper
Ivanov, A., Pellegrino, C., Rama, S., Dumalska, I., Salyha, Y., Ben‐Ari, Y., & Medina, I. (2006). Opposing role of synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors in regulation of the extracellular signal‐regulated kinases (ERK) activity in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.105510

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.