Cited by 71Muscle metabolism and nutritionExercise and Physiological ResponsesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Quantitative assessment of human muscle glycogen granules size and number in subcellular locations during recovery from prolonged exercise

Open access
Marchand, I., Tarnopolsky, M., Adamo, K. B., Bourgeois, J. M., Chorneyko, K., Graham, T. E.·2007·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Although data relating to muscle glycogen are interpreted as showing it is homogenous when quantified biochemically, it is actually in granules in specific subcellular locations. We hypothesized that postexercise restoration of muscle glycogen would occur initially by an increase in granule number followed by an increase in size, and also that restoration would differ in various subcellular locations. Five men performed prolonged exercise and had muscle biopsies taken at 0, 4, 24 and 48 h of recovery. We quantified granule number and size as well as the total volume of glycogen in the subsarcolemmal and the intra‐ and intermyofibrillar regions, using transmission electron microscopy. Muscle glycogen was reduced to 36 ± 8.3 mmol glucosyl units (kg dry weight)−1 at exhaustion, and was preferentially depleted and subsequently repleted in the intramyofibrillar space. The repletion rate was greatest in the first 4 h; this was associated with a 186% increase in number (P≤ 0.05) and no change in particle size (P≥ 0.05). From 4 h to 48 h, there was an increase in particle size (P≤ 0.05) but not number (P≥ 0.05). Net rate of G volume synthesis per unit area was 50% greater (P≤ 0.05) in the subsarcolemmal than the myofibrillar compartment. Conversely, the net rate of single‐particle volume synthesis was greater (P≤ 0.05) in the myofibrillar than the subsarcolemmal compartment. Glycogen granules varied in size and number depending on location, and in all compartments resynthesis of glycogen was characterized initially by an increase in granule number and later by an increase in size.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.122457

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 71

Authors
Marchand, I., Tarnopolsky, M., Adamo, K. B., Bourgeois, J. M., Chorneyko, K., & Graham, T. E.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CA)
  • St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Graham, T. E.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-10
Volume
580
Issue
2
Pages
617-628
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2148712176
Cited by
71
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McMaster University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
muscle glycogen, glycogen granules, granule size, post-exercise recovery, prolonged exercise, glycogen resynthesis, skeletal muscle
MeSH terms
Adult, Glycogen, Humans, Male, Particle Size, Time Factors, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review