Age-related change in duration of afterhyperpolarization of human motoneurones
Open accessAbstract
Motor unit (MU) potentials were recorded from brachial biceps of healthy subjects aged 5.5–79 years. The subjects were subdivided into young (5.5–19 year) and adult (37.5–79 year) groups, between which single MU discharge characteristics were compared. Firing rates were in the ranges of 8.3–21.7 s−1 (mean 12.87 s−1) and 5.9–18.7 s−1 (mean 11.08 s−1) for young and adult groups, respectively. Standard deviations (s.d.) of interspike intervals (ISIs) were in the range 4.84–11.57 ms (mean 8.39 ms) for the young group and 4.26–12.23 ms (mean 7.76 ms) for the adult group. Both differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Special attention was paid to the previously developed method of ISI variability analysis, which enabled the comparison of MUs with respect to afterhyperpolarization (AHP) duration of their motoneurones (MNs). The results show that AHP duration increases gradually with increasing age, which is in line with the transformation of muscle properties towards a slower phenotype. This transformation seems to be a continuous process, covering the entire lifespan of a human being, from childhood to senescence. The results presented here are significant for their insight into the ageing process of the neuromuscular system. The age‐related change in AHP duration has not been investigated previously in human studies and has been met with ambiguous results in animal studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The age-related prolongation in the duration of motor neuron afterhyperpolarization could be a relevant candidate to explain, at least in part, the reduced maximal rate of motor unit discharge during ballistic contractions in elderly adults.
“The age-related prolongation in the duration of motor neuron after hyperpolarization, as observed in the human biceps brachii by Piotrkiewicz et al. (2007), could be a relevant candidate to explain, at least in part, the reduced maximal rate of motor unit discharge during ballistic contractions in elderly adults.”
From Maximal discharge rate of motor units determines the maximal rate of force development during ballistic contractions in human (2014) · cites this paper as Piotrkiewicz et al., 2007
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Piotrkiewicz, M., Kudina, L., Mierzejewska, J., Jakubiec, M., & Hausmanowa‐Petrusewicz, I.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering (PL)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Corresponding author
- Piotrkiewicz, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-12
- Volume
- 585
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 483-490
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- PMC
- PMC2375492
- OpenAlex
- W1542865771
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Erasmus Research Institute of Management
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Keywords
- motor unit action potentials, age-related changes, interspike interval variability, firing rate
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Child, Child, Preschool, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Neurons, Muscle Contraction, Muscle, Skeletal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review