The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints
Open accessAbstract
Although the performance capabilities of muscle differ during shortening and lengthening contractions, realization of these differences during functional tasks depends on the characteristics of the activation signal discharged from the spinal cord. Fundamentally, the control strategy must differ during the two anisometric contractions due to the lesser force that each motor unit exerts during a shortening contraction and the greater difficulty associated with decreasing force to match a prescribed trajectory during a lengthening contraction. The activation characteristics of motor units during submaximal contractions depend on the details of the task being performed. Indexes of the strategy encoded in the descending command, such as coactivation of antagonist muscles and motor unit synchronization, indicate differences in cortical output for the two types of anisometric contractions. Furthermore, the augmented feedback from peripheral sensory receptors during lengthening contractions appears to be suppressed by centrally and peripherally mediated presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents, which may also explain the depression of voluntary activation that occurs during maximal lengthening contractions. Although modulation of the activation during shortening and lengthening contractions involves both supraspinal and spinal mechanisms, the association with differences in performance cannot be determined without more careful attention to the details of the task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning
Harris, C. M., & Wolpert, D. M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29528 · Cited by 2,498
Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools.
Fuglevand, A. J., Winter, D. A., & Patla, A. E. (1993) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2470 · Cited by 988
Van Cutsem, M., Duchateau, J., & Hainaut, K. (1998) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.295by.x · Cited by 777
Self-citationComparison of electromyogram spectra with force spectra during human elbow tremor.
Matthews, P. B., & Muir, R. B. (1980) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013254 · Cited by 70
Cited by
Heckman, C. J., & Enoka, R. M. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100087 · Cited by 414
Self-citationFranchi, M. V., Reeves, N. D., & Narici, M. V. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00447 · Cited by 386
Isometric exercise induces analgesia and reduces inhibition in patellar tendinopathy
Rio, E., Kidgell, D., Purdam, C., Gaida, J., Moseley, G. L., Pearce, A. J., & Cook, J. (2015) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-094386 · Cited by 348
Human motor unit recordings: Origins and insight into the integrated motor system
Duchateau, J., & Enoka, R. M. (2011) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.011 · Cited by 238
Self-citationEffects of ageing on motor unit activation patterns and reflex sensitivity in dynamic movements
Kallio, J., Avela, J., Moritani, T., Kanervo, M., Selänne, H., Komi, P., & Linnamo, V. (2010) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.12.005 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Duchateau, J., & Enoka, R. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-12
- Volume
- 586
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5853-5864
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2137375722
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2008.160747
- The paper
- Duchateau, J., & Enoka, R. M. (2008). Neural control of shortening and lengthening contractions: influence of task constraints. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2008.160747
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.