Cited by 37Lymphatic System and DiseasesLymphatic Disorders and TreatmentsCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Differential effects of myosin light chain kinase inhibition on contractility, force development and myosin light chain 20 phosphorylation of rat cervical and thoracic duct lymphatics

Open access
Nepiyushchikh, Zhanna V., Chakraborty, Sanjukta, Wang, Wei, Davis, Michael J., Zawieja, David C., Muthuchamy, Mariappan·2011·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Non‐Technical Summary The contractile activities of lymphatic muscle cells, which are the key for the lymphatic function, vary between lymphatic beds. We show that pressure‐dependent changes and myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) inhibition differentially affect myosin light chain 20 (MLC 20) phosphorylation in lymphatic muscle, thereby controlling the contractile behaviour of thoracic duct and cervical lymphatics. Our findings suggest that pressure‐induced changes in lymphatic contractile function act through MLC 20 di‐phosphorylation to modulate lymphatic tonic contractions, whereas the MLCK inhibitor ML‐7 affects both mono‐ and di‐phosphorylation of MLC 20 and consequently decreases tonic contractions. In addition, our data indicate that ML‐7 affects pacemaking activity of lymphatic muscle, and thereby decreases the lymphatic phasic contraction frequency. Thus the statuses of MLC 20 phosphorylation play essential roles in regulating the contractile activities of lymphatics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.218446

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spontaneous lymphatic contractions are regulated by the phosphorylation of myosin light chain 20 through the balance of myosin light chain kinase/phosphatase activities.

    “Spontaneous lymphatic contractions are regulated by the phosphorylation of myosin light chain 20 through the balance of myosin light chain kinase/phosphatase activities (62, 63).”

    From Transport and Immune Functions of the Lymphatic System. (2025) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Discussion (Fig. 7; page unavailable) reports that inhibiting myosin light chain kinase reduces MLC20 phosphorylation and tonic contraction, and can reduce phasic contraction frequency. It presents a role for myosin light chain phosphatase as a possible, not directly tested, pathway; it also says the effect on phasic pumping may involve other proteins. The claimed kinase/phosphatase balance as an established regulator of spontaneous contractions therefore goes beyond the findings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. C 2011 The Authors. Journal compilation C 2011 The Physiological Society 14697793, 2011, 22, Downloaded from https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/jphysiol.2011.218446 by Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Wiley Online Library on [23/06/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License J Physiol 589. · DOI
  2. Mislin H (1966). Structural and functional relations of the mesenteric lymph vessels. New Trends in Basic Lymphology; Proceedings of a Symposium held at Charleroi (Belgium); July 11-13, 1966. Experientia 14, 87-96.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nepiyushchikh, Z. V., Chakraborty, S., Wang, W., Davis, M. J., Zawieja, D. C., & Muthuchamy, M.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11
Volume
589
Issue
22
Pages
5415-5429
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W1531642080
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • Lymphatic Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (KO2 HL86650, HL80526, HL86650)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL089784, R01HL080526, R01 HL80526, K02HL086650, R01-HL-75199, R01 HL96552, K02 HL86650, R01HL075199, R01HL096552, R01HL089784)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lymphatic System and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
lymphatic contractility, myosin light chain kinase, ML-7, myosin light chain 20 phosphorylation, tonic contraction, phasic contractions, transmural pressure, isometric force, smooth muscle contraction regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Azepines, Enzyme Inhibitors, Lymphatic System, Male, Muscle Contraction, Myosin-Light-Chain Kinase, Naphthalenes, Neck, Phosphorylation, Thoracic Duct, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Myosin Light Chains, Lymphatic Vessels, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review