Cited by 207Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyAdipose Tissue and MetabolismMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Sprint interval and traditional endurance training increase net intramuscular triglyceride breakdown and expression of perilipin 2 and 5

Open access
Shepherd, S. O., Cocks, M., Tipton, K. D., Ranasinghe, A. M., Barker, T. A., Burniston, J. G., Wagenmakers, A. J. M., Shaw, C. S.·2013·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

Key points Increases in aerobic capacity and intramuscular triglyceride (IMTG) utilization are well‐described adaptations to endurance training (ET) and contribute to improvements in insulin sensitivity. Sprint interval training (SIT) also improves aerobic capacity and insulin sensitivity with a lower time commitment than ET. This study aimed to determine whether SIT also induces improvements in insulin sensitivity and net IMTG breakdown, and to investigate the underlying mechanisms. Six weeks of ET and SIT increased net IMTG breakdown during moderate‐intensity cycling, and improved insulin sensitivity. A greater concentration of lipid droplet‐associated proteins, perilipin 2 and perilipin 5, was observed following both training modes and contributes to the increases in net IMTG breakdown following training. The results suggest a novel mechanism for the training‐induced improvements in IMTG breakdown and insulin sensitivity, and clearly demonstrate that SIT is an alternative, time‐efficient training strategy that induces similar beneficial metabolic adaptations. Abstract Intramuscular triglyceride (IMTG) utilization is enhanced by endurance training (ET) and is linked to improved insulin sensitivity. This study first investigated the hypothesis that ET‐induced increases in net IMTG breakdown and insulin sensitivity are related to increased expression of perilipin 2 (PLIN2) and perilipin 5 (PLIN5). Second, we hypothesized that sprint interval training (SIT) also promotes increases in IMTG utilization and insulin sensitivity. Sixteen sedentary males performed 6 weeks of either SIT (4–6, 30 s Wingate tests per session, 3 days week−1) or ET (40–60 min moderate‐intensity cycling, 5 days week−1). Training increased resting IMTG content (SIT 1.7‐fold, ET 2.4‐fold; P < 0.05), concomitant with parallel increases in PLIN2 (SIT 2.3‐fold, ET 2.8‐fold; P < 0.01) and PLIN5 expression (SIT 2.2‐fold, ET 3.1‐fold; P < 0.01). Pre‐training, 60 min cycling at ∼65% pre‐training decreased IMTG content in type I fibres (SIT 17 ± 10%, ET 15 ± 12%; P < 0.05). Following training, a significantly greater breakdown of IMTG in type I fibres occurred during exercise (SIT 27 ± 13%, ET 43 ± 6%; P < 0.05), with preferential breakdown of PLIN2‐ and particularly PLIN5‐associated lipid droplets. Training increased the Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (SIT 56 ± 15%, ET 29 ± 12%; main effect P < 0.05). No training × group interactions were observed for any variables. In conclusion, SIT and ET both increase net IMTG breakdown during exercise and increase in PLIN2 and PLIN5 protein expression. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that increases in PLIN2 and PLIN5 are related to the mechanisms that promote increased IMTG utilization during exercise and improve insulin sensitivity following 6 weeks of SIT and ET.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.240952

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 207

Authors
Shepherd, S. O., Cocks, M., Tipton, K. D., Ranasinghe, A. M., Barker, T. A., Burniston, J. G., Wagenmakers, A. J. M., & Shaw, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Corresponding author
Wagenmakers, A. J. M.
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-18
Volume
591
Issue
3
Pages
657-675
ISSN
  • 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7793
OpenAlex
W2119544098
Cited by
207
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 1
FWCI
50.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
sprint interval training, endurance training, intramuscular triglycerides, PLIN2, perilipin 5, insulin sensitivity, lipid droplets, type I muscle fibers, cardiorespiratory fitness, training effects, Wingate test, moderate-intensity cycling, sedentary men, gene expression, lipid metabolism
MeSH terms
Perilipin-2, Perilipin-5, Adult, Bicycling, Blood Glucose, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Male, Membrane Proteins, Physical Endurance, Proteins, Triglycerides, Muscle, Skeletal, Young Adult, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review