Cited by 381Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesElasticity and Material ModelingCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Image-Based Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling in Realistic Arterial Geometries

Steinman, David A.·2002·Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Local hemodynamics are an important factor in atherosclerosis, from the development of early lesions, to the assessment of stroke risk, to determining the ultimate fate of a mature plaque. Until recently, our understanding of arterial fluid dynamics and their relationship to atherosclerosis was limited by the use of idealized or averaged artery models. Recent advances in medical imaging, computerized image processing, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) now make it possible to computationally reconstruct the time-varying, three-dimensional blood flow patterns in anatomically realistic models. In this paper we review progress, made largely within the last five years, towards the routine use of anatomically realistic CFD models, derived from in vivo medical imaging, to elucidate the role of local hemodynamics in the development and progression of atherosclerosis in large arteries. In addition to describing various image-based CFD studies carried out to date, we review the medical imaging and image processing techniques available to acquire the necessary geometric and functional boundary conditions. Issues related to accuracy, precision, and modeling assumptions are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1114/1.1467679

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biggest problem with automatic segmentation and 3D reconstruction is the inability to fully automate the segmentation process, because of different imaging modalities, varying vessel geometries, and the quality of source images.

    “The biggest problem with automatic segmentation and 3D reconstruction is the inability to fully automate the segmentation process, because of different imaging modalities, varying vessel geometries, and the quality of source images [199].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinman, D. A.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Steinman, David A.
Venue
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Published
2002-04
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
483-497
ISSN
0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085829794
Cited by
381
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
image-based computational fluid dynamics, arterial hemodynamics, atherosclerosis, diagnostic imaging, image processing, three-dimensional blood flow, large arteries, plaque development, stroke risk, boundary conditions
MeSH terms
Arteries, Arteriosclerosis, Blood Flow Velocity, Endothelium, Vascular, Hemodynamics, Humans, Image Enhancement, Models, Cardiovascular, Muscle, Smooth, Vascular, Radiography, Stress, Mechanical, Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of Results, Tunica Intima, Hemorheology, Magnetic Resonance Angiography, Finite Element Analysis, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review