Cited by 117Control Systems and IdentificationStatistical and numerical algorithmsGene Regulatory Network Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Generalized Sensitivity Functions in Physiological System Identification

Thomaseth, Karl, Cobelli, Claudio·1999·Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Parameters of physiological models are commonly associated in an input-output experiment with a specific pattern of the system response. This association is often made on an intuitive basis by traditional sensitivity analysis, i.e., by inspecting the variations of model output trajectories with respect to parameter variations. However, this approach provides limited information since, for instance, it ignores correlation among parameters. The aim of this study is to propose a new set of sensitivity functions, called the generalized sensitivity functions (GSF), for the analysis of input-output identification experiments. GSF are based on information theoretical criteria and provide, as compared to traditional sensitivity analysis, a more accurate picture on the information content of measured outputs on individual model parameters at different times. Case studies are presented on an input-output model and on two structural circulatory and respiratory models. GSF allow the definition of relevant time intervals for the identification of specific parameters and improve the understanding of the role played by specific model parameters in describing experimental data.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1114/1.207

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 117

Metadata

Authors
Thomaseth, K., & Cobelli, C.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Published
1999-09
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
607-616
ISSN
0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978548185
Cited by
117
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
parameter sensitivity analysis, information-theoretic criteria, parameter correlation, circulatory model, respiratory model
MeSH terms
Animals, Compliance, Dogs, Hemodynamics, Models, Biological, Models, Cardiovascular, Research Design, Respiration, Pulmonary Ventilation, Vascular Resistance, Linear Models, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized Sensitivity Functions in Physiological System Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1114/1.207
The paper
Thomaseth, K., & Cobelli, C. (1999). Generalized Sensitivity Functions in Physiological System Identification. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1114/1.207