The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Generalized Sensitivity Functions in Physiological System Identification
Abstract
Parameters of physiological models are commonly associated in an input-output experiment with a specific pattern of the system response. This association is often made on an intuitive basis by traditional sensitivity analysis, i.e., by inspecting the variations of model output trajectories with respect to parameter variations. However, this approach provides limited information since, for instance, it ignores correlation among parameters. The aim of this study is to propose a new set of sensitivity functions, called the generalized sensitivity functions (GSF), for the analysis of input-output identification experiments. GSF are based on information theoretical criteria and provide, as compared to traditional sensitivity analysis, a more accurate picture on the information content of measured outputs on individual model parameters at different times. Case studies are presented on an input-output model and on two structural circulatory and respiratory models. GSF allow the definition of relevant time intervals for the identification of specific parameters and improve the understanding of the role played by specific model parameters in describing experimental data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Clearly such an analysis is also a key component in the modeling of QSP systems, and with techniques such as generalized sensitivity functions, should be a fundamental component in QSP modeling.70”
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomaseth, K., & Cobelli, C.
- Affiliations
- National Research Council (IT)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Venue
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 607-616
- ISSN
- 0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978548185
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- parameter sensitivity analysis, information-theoretic criteria, parameter correlation, circulatory model, respiratory model
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Compliance, Dogs, Hemodynamics, Models, Biological, Models, Cardiovascular, Research Design, Respiration, Pulmonary Ventilation, Vascular Resistance, Linear Models, Nonlinear Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generalized Sensitivity Functions in Physiological System Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1114/1.207
- The paper
- Thomaseth, K., & Cobelli, C. (1999). Generalized Sensitivity Functions in Physiological System Identification. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1114/1.207