Computational modeling of cell sorting, tissue engulfment, and related phenomena: A review
Abstract
Embryonic cells have the remarkable ability to spontaneously reposition themselves with respect to other cells in an aggregate, an ability that is central to embryo morphogenesis, many disease processes, wound healing, and tissue engineering. In these rearrangements, cells of two or more histological types in a heterotypic aggregate can sort, mix or form checkerboard patterns and contacting fragments of different homogeneous tissues can spread over or engulf one another. In this article, the experimental literature on cell and tissue reorganization is summarized, the main sub-cellular structural components are identified and hypotheses about how these components interact to drive specific patterns of rearrangement are outlined. Making extensive use of tables, the article then maps out the interplay between experiments, theories, ultrastructural discoveries and computer models in the advancement of the field. The article summarizes the main computational approaches, including cell and sub-cellular lattices, body centric, boundary vertex and finite element models. The principle of operation, advantages and disadvantages of each approach is discussed, and the contributions of representative papers noted. Strong commonalities are found in the physical basis of the models and in the predictions they make. Computational models provide an important ongoing complement to experimental and theoretical studies. This review article cites 154 references.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In cell sorting, a randomly mixed cell population displaying two or more cell types experiences a global arrangement due to differential adhesion energies.
“An example is illustrated by the classical work on cell sorting (figure 6d), where a randomly mixed cell population displaying two or more cell types experiences a global arrangement due to differential adhesion energies [228,229].”
From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [229]
Cites
Steinberg, M. S. (1975) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(75)80091-9 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems
Solé, R., Kempes, C. P., Corominas-Murtra, B., De Domenico, M., Kolchinsky, A., Lachmann, M., Libby, E., Saavedra, S., Smith, E., & Wolpert, D. (2024) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2024.0010 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brodland, G. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Brodland, G Wayne
- ORCID
- Brodland, G Wayne
- Venue
- Applied Mechanics Reviews
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-76
- ISSN
- 0003-6900 (ISSN-L)
- 2379-0407
- OpenAlex
- W2088631628
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Mechanics Reviews (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- cell sorting, cell rearrangement, checkerboard pattern, cell ultrastructure, finite element model, tissue morphogenesis, cell mechanics, wound healing, tissue engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review