Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Age Dependency of the Biaxial Biomechanical Behavior of Human Abdominal Aorta

Geest, Jonathan P. Vande, Sacks, Michael S., Vorp, David A.·2004·Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Abstract

Background: The biomechanical behavior of the human abdominal aorta has been studied with great interest primarily due to its propensity to develop such maladies as atherosclerotic occlusive disease, dissections, and aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to investigate the age-related biaxial biomechanical behavior of human infrarenal aortic tissue. Methods of Approach: A total of 18 samples (13 autopsy, 5 organ donor) were harvested from patients in each of three age groups: Group 1 (<30years old, n=5), Group 2 (between 30 and 60 years old, n=7), and Group 3 (>60years old, n=6). Each specimen was tested biaxially using a tension-controlled protocol which spanned a large portion of the strain plane. Response functions fit to experimental data were used as a tool to guide the appropriate choice of the strain energy function W. Results: Under an equibiaxial tension of 120 N/m, the average peak stretch values in the circumferential direction for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were mean±SD1.46±0.07,1.15±0.07, and 1.11±0.06, respectively, while the peak stretch values in the longitudinal direction were 1.41±0.03,1.19±0.11, and 1.10±0.04, respectively. There were no significant differences between the average longitudinal and circumferential peak stretch within each group p>0.1, but both of these values were significantly less p<0.001 for Groups 2 and 3 when compared to Group 1. Patients in Group 1 were modeled using a polynomial strain energy function W, while patients in Groups 2 and 3 were modeled using an exponential form of W, suggesting an age-dependent shift in the mechanical response of this tissue. Conclusion: The biaxial tensile testing results reported here are, to our knowledge, the first given for the human infrarenal aorta and reinforce the importance of determining the functional form of W from experimental data. Such information may be useful for the clinician or researcher in identifying key changes in the biomechanical response of abdominal aorta in the presence of an aneurysm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.1824121

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Geest, J. P. V., Sacks, M. S., & Vorp, D. A.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
126
Issue
6
Pages
815-822
ISSN
  • 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-8951
OpenAlex
W2153425560
Cited by
164
References
0
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age Dependency of the Biaxial Biomechanical Behavior of Human Abdominal Aorta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.1824121
The paper
Geest, J. P. V., Sacks, M. S., & Vorp, D. A. (2004). Age Dependency of the Biaxial Biomechanical Behavior of Human Abdominal Aorta. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1824121

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.