The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of the Surface Topography of Micromachined Titanium Substrata on Cell Behavior in Vitro and in Vivo
Abstract
Surface properties, including topography and chemistry, are of prime importance in establishing the response of tissues to biomaterials. Microfabrication techniques have enabled the production of precisely controlled surface topographies that have been used as substrata for cells in culture and on devices implanted in vivo. This article reviews aspects of cell behavior involved in tissue response to implants with an emphasis on the effects of topography. Microfabricated grooved surfaces produce orientation and directed locomotion of epithelial cells in vitro and can inhibit epithelial downgrowth on implants. The effects depend on the groove dimensions and they are modified by epithelial cell–cell interactions. Fibroblasts similarly exhibit contact guidance on grooved surfaces, but fibroblast shape in vitro differs markedly from that found in vivo. Surface topography is important in establishing tissue organization adjacent to implants, with smooth surfaces generally being associated with fibrous tissue encapsulation. Grooved topographies appear to have promise in reducing encapsulation in the short term, but additional studies employing three-dimensional reconstruction and diverse topographies are needed to understand better the process of connective-tissue organization adjacent to implants. Microfabricated surfaces can increase the frequency of mineralized bone-like tissue nodules adjacent to subcutaneously implanted surfaces in rats. Orientation of these nodules with grooves occurs both in culture and on implants. Detailed comparisons of cell behavior on micromachined substrata in vitro and in vivo are difficult because of the number and complexity of factors, such as population density and micromotion, that can differ between these conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of cell shape in growth control
Folkman, J., & Moscona, A. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/273345a0 · Cited by 2,422
Wilkinson, D. W. (1987) · doi:10.1242/dev.99.3.439 · Cited by 418
Cited by
Kasemo, B. (2002) · Surface Science · doi:10.1016/s0039-6028(01)01809-x · Cited by 1,079
Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature
Quirynen, M., De Soete, M., & Van Steenberghe, D. (2002) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130101.x · Cited by 665
The biocompatibility of novel starch-based polymers and composites: in vitro studies
Marques, A. P., Reis, R. L., & Hunt, J. A. (2002) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00272-1 · Cited by 347
Refai, A. K., Textor, M., Brunette, D. M., & Waterfield, J. D. (2004) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30075 · Cited by 296
Self-citationEngineering cell alignment in vitro
Li, Y., Huang, G., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Du, Y., Lu, T. J., & Xu, F. (2014) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.11.007 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Brunette, D. M., & Chehroudi, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-57
- ISSN
- 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8951
- OpenAlex
- W2043786008
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of the Surface Topography of Micromachined Titanium Substrata on Cell Behavior in Vitro and in Vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.2798042
- The paper
- Brunette, D. M., & Chehroudi, B. (1999). The Effects of the Surface Topography of Micromachined Titanium Substrata on Cell Behavior in Vitro and in Vivo. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2798042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.