The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fracture Prediction for the Proximal Femur Using Finite Element Models: Part I—Linear Analysis
Abstract
Over 90 percent of the more than 250,000 hip fractures that occur annually in the United States are the result of falls from standing height. Despite this, the stresses associated with femoral fracture from a fall have not been investigated previously. Our objectives were to use three-dimensional finite element models of the proximal femur (with geometries and material properties based directly on quantitative computed tomography) to compare predicted stress distributions for one-legged stance and for a fall to the lateral greater trochanter. We also wished to test the correspondence between model predictions and in vitro strain gage data and failure loads for cadaveric femora subjected to these loading conditions. An additional goal was to use the model predictions to compare the sensitivity of several imaging sites in the proximal femur which are used for the in vivo prediction of hip fracture risk. In this first of two parts, linear finite element models of two unpaired human cadaveric femora were generated. In Part II, the models were extended to include nonlinear material properties for the cortical and trabecular bone. While there was poor correspondence between strain gage data and model predictions, there was excellent agreement between the in vitro failure data and the linear model, especially using a von Mises effective strain failure criterion. Both the onset of structural yielding (within 22 and 4 percent) and the load at fracture (within 8 and 5 percent) were predicted accurately for the two femora tested. For the simulation of one-legged stance, the peak stresses occurred in the primary compressive trabeculae of the subcapital region. However, for a simulated fall, the peak stresses were in the intertrochanteric region. The Ward’s triangle (basicervical) site commonly used for the clinical assessment of osteoporosis was not heavily loaded in either situation. These findings suggest that the intertrochanteric region may be the most sensitive site for the assessment of fracture risk due to a fall and the subcapital region for fracture risk due to repetitive activities such as walking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Trabecular bone modulus–density relationships depend on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., Bayraktar, H. H., & Keaveny, T. M. (2003) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00071-x · Cited by 1,209
Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone
Nalla, R. K., Kinney, J. H., & Ritchie, R. O. (2003) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat832 · Cited by 730
Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site
Morgan, E. F., & Keaveny, T. M. (2001) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00011-2 · Cited by 705
Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review
Doblaré, M., Garcı́a, J. M., & Gómez, M. J. (2004) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.08.003 · Cited by 504
Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone
Keaveny, T. M., Pinilla, T. P., Crawford, R. P., Kopperdahl, D. L., & Lou, A. (1997) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100150115 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Lotz, J. C., Cheal, E. J., & Hayes, W. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 1991-11-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 353-360
- ISSN
- 0148-0731 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8951
- OpenAlex
- W2081081045
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fracture Prediction for the Proximal Femur Using Finite Element Models: Part I—Linear Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.2895412
- The paper
- Lotz, J. C., Cheal, E. J., & Hayes, W. C. (1991). Fracture Prediction for the Proximal Femur Using Finite Element Models: Part I—Linear Analysis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2895412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.