Air-Side Surface Wettability Effects on the Performance of Slit-Fin-and-Tube Heat Exchangers Operating Under Wet-Surface Conditions
Abstract
A study of condensate retention and the attendant thermal-hydraulic effect associated with changes in air-side surface wettability is presented for a series of slit-fin-and-tube heat exchangers of identical geometry with controlled wettability covering a wide range of contact angles. An experiment in which the retained mass of air-side condensate was measured under dynamic conditions is described, and the results are analyzed using conventional thermal-hydraulic measurements of j and f. The data demonstrate that for the heat exchangers used in this study, the j factor is not strongly influenced by condensate retention, but the friction factor is significantly reduced for surfaces of increased wettability. Hydrophilic heat exchangers retain much less air-side condensate than do the hydrophobic heat exchangers, and the amount of retention is found to depend on the air-side Reynolds number (Redh) and the rate of latent heat transfer (Ql). Based on an assumption of filmwise condensation, a new model for predicting the mass of retained condensate is described and compared with the steady-sate retention data. The model is successful in predicting retained condensate over a wide range of tested conditions. The potential of this new approach and possible refinements that will add engineering value are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For slit fin tube heat exchangers under wet conditions, coated heat exchangers have slightly lower heat transfer performance than uncoated heat exchangers, and hydrophilic heat exchangers exhibit the lowest friction factors, followed by uncoated and hydrophobic coated heat exchangers.
“The coated heat exchangers have slightly lower heat transfer performance than the uncoated heat exchangers. Hydrophilic heat exchangers exhibited the lowest friction factors, followed by uncoated and hydrophobic coated heat exchangers.”
Cites
Wang, C.-C., Lee, W.-S., Sheu, W.-J., & Chang, Y.-J. (2002) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/s1359-4311(01)00090-4 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Amer, M., & Wang, C.-C. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.120 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Xiong, T., Liu, G., Gao, Q., Yan, G., & Yu, J. (2023) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105654 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, L., & Jacobi, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- ORCID
- Jacobi, A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Heat Transfer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-18
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0022-1481 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-8943
- OpenAlex
- W2054977706
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- LG Electronics
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer Mechanisms
- Keywords
- wettability, hydrophilic surfaces, hydrophobic surfaces, contact angle, friction factor, heat transfer coefficient, film condensation, latent heat transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review