The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Testing and Analysis of Inerter Devices
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a first in-depth experimental study of mechanical devices that are designed to approximate the dynamics of the ideal inerter, which is a two-terminal mechanical element analogous to the ungrounded capacitor. The focus of the paper is experimental testing and identification of stand-alone inerter devices as well as the study of practical issues involved in their feedback control using standard hydraulic damper test rigs. Two contrasting inerter embodiments are studied, one in which a flywheel is driven by a rack-and-pinion mechanism and the other employing a ballscrew. Due to the fact that the ideal inerter is a dynamic element whose admittance function is 90 deg out of phase with that of the ideal damper, particular attention is needed to ensure closed-loop stability in testing using standard hydraulic damper test rigs. As expected, instability is observed in default configurations, and it is seen to manifest itself in a nonlinear manner with backlash playing a significant role. By using a basic model of the hydraulic rig and a model of an ideal inerter with backlash, the nature of the instability is reproduced and explained in a qualitative way. To achieve closed-loop stability without the need to redesign the controller as a function of the load, a methodology is proposed involving the design of a mechanical buffer network to be connected in series with the inerter device. It is demonstrated that this approach removes the instability problem for a wide range of inertance loads. Finally, the dynamic characteristics of the inerter devices are identified. It is verified experimentally that the admittance of the devices approaches the ideal inerter admittance over a useful frequency range and that friction in the devices is a major source of deviation from the ideal inerter behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter
Smith, M. C. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2002.803532 · Cited by 1,828
Self-citation
Cited by
Using an inerter‐based device for structural vibration suppression
Lazar, I. F., Neild, S. A., & Wagg, D. J. (2014) · Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · doi:10.1002/eqe.2390 · Cited by 799
Inerter-based structural vibration control: A state-of-the-art review
Ma, R., Bi, K., & Hao, H. (2021) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112655 · Cited by 445
Shen, W., Niyitangamahoro, A., Feng, Z., & Zhu, H. (2019) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109470 · Cited by 175
Gonzalez-Buelga, A., Lazar, I. F., Jiang, J. Z., Neild, S. A., & Inman, D. J. (2017) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.1879 · Cited by 136
Zhang, Z., Gao, Z.-T., Fang, B., & Zhang, Y.-W. (2022) · Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11071-022-07490-8 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Papageorgiou, C., Houghton, N. E., & Smith, M. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2008-12-04
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0022-0434 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-9028
- OpenAlex
- W2051080665
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Testing and Analysis of Inerter Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.3023120
- The paper
- Papageorgiou, C., Houghton, N. E., & Smith, M. C. (2009). Experimental Testing and Analysis of Inerter Devices. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3023120
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.