The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurements in Fully Developed Turbulent Channel Flow
Abstract
Measurements in a turbulent channel flow of air are presented for three Reynolds numbers. The design features of the present system suggest that the flow is a closer approximation to fully developed, two-dimensional turbulent flow between two parallel plates than those documented by previous investigators. Comparison of the new data with previous data reveal distinct differences, some of which can be attributed to differences in apparatus design. Interest in these data stems from the fact that channel flow serves as a reference flow for testing various theoretical models and experimental techniques involving turbulent shear flows.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number
Kim, J., Moin, P., & Moser, R. (1987) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112087000892 · Cited by 4,873
Mason, P. J., & Callen, N. S. (1986) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112086002112 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Hussain, A. K. M. F., & Reynolds, W. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluids Engineering
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 1975-12-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 568-578
- ISSN
- 0098-2202 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-901X
- OpenAlex
- W2046926018
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurements in Fully Developed Turbulent Channel Flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1115/1.3448125
- The paper
- Hussain, A. K. M. F., & Reynolds, W. C. (1975). Measurements in Fully Developed Turbulent Channel Flow. Journal of Fluids Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3448125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
