Cited by 97Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsMuscle activation and electromyography studiesSpinal Cord Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Method for the Autonomous Control of Lower Limb Exoskeletons for Persons With Paraplegia

Open access
Quintero, Hugo A., Farris, Ryan J., Goldfarb, Michael·2012·Journal of Medical Devices

Abstract

Efforts have recently been reported by several research groups on the development of computer-controlled lower limb orthoses to enable legged locomotion in persons with paraplegia. Such systems must employ a control framework that provides essential movements to the paraplegic user (i.e., sitting, standing, and walking), and ideally enable the user to autonomously command these various movements in a safe, reliable, and intuitive manner. This paper describes a control method that enables a paraplegic user to perform sitting, standing, and walking movements, which are commanded based on postural information measured by the device. The proposed user interface and control structure was implemented on a powered lower limb orthosis, and the system was tested on a paraplegic subject with a T10 complete injury. Experimental data is presented that indicates the ability of the proposed control architecture to provide appropriate user-initiated control of sitting, standing, and walking. The authors also provide a link to a video that qualitatively demonstrates the user's ability to independently control basic movements via the proposed control method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.4007181

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2009, Development of Hybrid Orthosis for Standing, Walking, and Stair Climbing After Spinal Cord Injury, J. Rehabil. Res. Dev., 43, 447

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 97

Metadata

Authors
Quintero, H. A., Farris, R. J., & Goldfarb, M.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Journal of Medical Devices
Published
2012-10-11
Volume
6
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 1932-6181 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-619X
OpenAlex
W2157391706
Cited by
97
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Devices (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD059832)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Cord Injury Research
Keywords
lower limb exoskeleton, paraplegia, autonomous control, gait assistance, user interface, legged locomotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review