Cited by 12Probabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignReliability and Maintenance OptimizationStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis

Efficient Reliability Assessment With the Conditional Probability Method

Mansour, Rami, Olsson, Mårten·2018·Journal of Mechanical Design

Abstract

Reliability assessment is an important procedure in engineering design in which the probability of failure or equivalently the probability of survival is computed based on appropriate design criteria and model behavior. In this paper, a new approximate and efficient reliability assessment method is proposed: the conditional probability method (CPM). Focus is set on computational efficiency and the proposed method is applied to classical load-strength structural reliability problems. The core of the approach is in the computation of the probability of failure starting from the conditional probability of failure given the load. The number of function evaluations to compute the probability of failure is a priori known to be 3n + 2 in CPM, where n is the number of stochastic design variables excluding the strength. The necessary number of function evaluations for the reliability assessment, which may correspond to expensive computations, is therefore substantially lower in CPM than in the existing structural reliability methods such as the widely used first-order reliability method (FORM).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/1.4040170

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Mansour, R., & Olsson, M.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Mansour, Rami
  • Olsson, Mårten
Venue
Journal of Mechanical Design
Published
2018-06-01
Volume
140
Issue
8
ISSN
  • 0161-8458 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-0472
  • 1528-9001
OpenAlex
W2800076556
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Mechanical Design (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Keywords
reliability analysis, failure probability, structural reliability, computational efficiency, first-order reliability method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review