Design Fixation From Initial Examples: Provided Versus Self-Generated Ideas
Open accessAbstract
Jansson and Smith (1991, “Design Fixation,” Des. Stud., 12(1), pp. 3–11) demonstrated that design fixation occurs when an example solution is provided along with a design problem. After seeing an example concept—even with its flaws pointed out—new designs often share its features. In Jansson and Smith’s studies, a control group saw no example and showed less fixation to the example provided only in the other group. However, another source of fixation from an initial example may arise in the control group from the designer’s own first-generated concept. We conducted a large-scale experiment with beginning engineers to investigate whether design fixation occurs even without seeing a provided example. Half of the participants saw an example solution and half were given no example; instead, they generated their own initial design. Next, all students were individually brainstormed ideas for 30 min. We analyzed both groups’ concepts for fixation on the first solution they saw—either the example provided or their own initial concept. The results showed that the students provided with an example concept experienced less fixation on the initial example than those in the control group, whose concepts were evaluated for similarity to their own initial concept. To consider whether fixation on initial examples (provided or self-generated) might be mitigated, we asked these students to complete a second (30 min) idea generation phase using Design Heuristics for idea inspiration. The results showed that both groups experienced less fixation during the second-generation phase. These findings suggest that fixation on first solutions occurs in individual idea generation arising from both provided examples and self-generated concepts. However, more divergent idea generation can be facilitated through the use of design tools, such as Design Heuristics, to mitigate the consequences of design fixation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participants tend to fixate on self-generated ideas and concepts compared to initial examples.
“Further, studies have shown that participants tend to fixate on self-generated ideas and concepts compared to initial examples [38].”
From The Effects of Generative AI on Design Fixation and Divergent Thinking (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 82 · Cited by 33
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Viswanathan, V., Esposito, N., and Linsey, J., 2012, "Training Tomorrow's Designers: A Study on Design Fixation," ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX.
- Perkins, D., 1997, "Creativity's Camel: The Role of Analogy in Invention," Creative Thought, T. Ward, S. Smith, and J. Vaid, eds., American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 523-528.
- Authors
- Leahy, K., Daly, S. R., McKilligan, S., & Seifert, C. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Limerick (IE)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Iowa State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Mechanical Design
- Publisher
- ASME International
- Published
- 2020-04-02
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 0161-8458 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-0472
- 1528-9001
- OpenAlex
- W3008667727
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Mechanical Design (publishedVersion)
- Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (#0927474, #1140256, #1323251, #1322552)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Architecture › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Keywords
- design fixation, design examples, idea generation, brainstorming, design heuristics, divergent thinking, design education, concept similarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review