Cited by 189Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesMachine Learning in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Review of Machine Learning Applications in Additive Manufacturing

Razvi, Sayyeda Saadia, Feng, Shaw, Narayanan, Anantha, Lee, Yung-Tsun Tina, Witherell, Paul·2019·Volume 1: 39th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference

Abstract

Variability in product quality continues to pose a major barrier to the widespread application of additive manufacturing (AM) processes in production environment. Towards addressing this barrier, monitoring AM processes and measuring AM materials and parts has become increasingly commonplace, and increasingly precise, making a new wave of AM-related data available. This newfound data provides a valuable resource for gaining new insight to AM processes and decision making. Machine Learning (ML) provides an avenue to gain this insight by 1) learning fundamental knowledge about AM processes and 2) identifying predictive and actionable recommendations to optimize part quality and process design. This report presents a literature review of ML applications in AM. The review identifies areas in the AM lifecycle, including design, process plan, build, post process, and test and validation, that have been researched using ML. Furthermore, this report discusses the benefits of ML for AM, as well as existing hurdles currently limiting applications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/detc2019-98415

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The integration of machine learning in manufacturing has been well-established in recent years, aiming to enhance efficiency and precision in the manufacturing process.

    “The integration of machine learning in manufacturing has been well-established in recent years, aiming to enhance efficiency and precision in the manufacturing process [415-419].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Razvi, S. S., Feng, S., Narayanan, A., Lee, Y.-T. T., & Witherell, P.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Volume 1: 39th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
Published
2019-08-18
OpenAlex
W2972263106
Cited by
189
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2
FWCI
20.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ASME International Computers in Engineering Conference and Engineering Database Symposium (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
additive manufacturing, machine learning applications, process monitoring, part quality prediction, process optimization, process planning, post-processing, material characterization, data-driven decision making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review