Cited by 7Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignTopology Optimization in Engineering

Uncertainty Quantification in Material Properties of Additively Manufactured Materials for Application in Topology Optimization

Kazemi, Zahra, Steeves, Craig A.·2022·Volume 3: Advanced Materials: Design, Processing, Characterization and Applications; Advances in Aerospace Technology

Abstract

This research presents an approach to measuring the inherent randomness in properties of materials fabricated by the fused filament fabrication (FFF) method. Defects associated with the layer-by-layer process introduce significant variability in the elastic modulus field of materials printed. To describe the random distribution in Young’s modulus fields, statistical properties of mean, variance, and correlation length must be estimated for bulk regions (the printed filaments) and fusion regions (the thin regions connecting printed filaments). The goal is to estimate the random properties from the surface strain fields calculated by digital image correlation (DIC) analysis. A machine learning algorithm is developed that can estimate the spatial variations in the elastic modulus. The model is trained on a dataset of simulated two-dimensional strain fields with known random distributions in the corresponding elastic modulus fields generated by finite element (FE) simulations. On the test data, we achieved the R2 score of 0.93 and 0.95 for the mean in the bulk and fusion Young’s modulus fields, respectively. Also, for the variance in bulk and fusion areas, the R2 score of 0.74 and 0.83 are achieved, respectively. The results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach in measuring the randomness in material properties of FFF-based printed materials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1115/imece2022-95195

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Machine learning models can also be trained to quantify spatial variations within material properties and measure local mechanical properties of printed materials based on digital image correlation (DIC) strain fields as input.

    “Machine learning models can also be trained to quantify spatial variations within material properties and measure local mechanical properties of printed materials based on digital image correlation (DIC) strain fields as input [450,451].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kazemi, Z., & Steeves, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Volume 3: Advanced Materials: Design, Processing, Characterization and Applications; Advances in Aerospace Technology
Published
2022-10-30
OpenAlex
W4319589234
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Topology Optimization in Engineering
Keywords
uncertainty quantification, additive manufacturing, fused deposition modeling, Young's modulus, topology optimization, digital image correlation, surface strain field, machine learning, correlation length, layer defects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review