Cited by 12

Influence of vacuum gauges on outgassing rate measurements

Saitoh, M., Shimura, K., Iwata, T., Momose, T., Ishimaru, H.·1993·Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films

Abstract

When the outgassing rates from eighteen chamber samples with different surface treatments for ultrahigh vacuum were measured by the throughput method, the minimum specific outgassing rate measured was limited to about 10−13 Torr ℓ/s/cm2 due to the outgassing of a Bayard–Alpert gauge (BAG), about 10−9 Torr ℓ/s. A measurement of outgassing rates with a BAG and an extractor gauge (EG) showed that the outgassing rate of the EG is lower than that of the BAG and that outgassing due to thermal desorption from the wall surrounding of the gauges cannot be neglected in seeking to obtain correct outgassing rates for the gauges, especially for the case after baking. A new type of quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) and an extractor gauge (EG) showed an outgassing rate of 6–7×10−11 Torr ℓ/s. Using the QMS and EG, a minimum specific outgassing rate from the sample chambers was measured on the order of 10−14 Torr ℓ/s/cm2 from the total pressure. The measurement showed that the main residual gas species are H2O, before baking, and H2, after baking. Therefore, the outgassing rate (q) must be described using the partial pressures of the residual gases and was 2.0×10−10 Torr ℓ/s/cm2 for water (qH2O) and 1.4×10−13 Torr ℓ/s/cm2 for hydrogen (qH2) from an A6063 EX mirror-finished sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1116/1.578646

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saitoh, M., Shimura, K., Iwata, T., Momose, T., & Ishimaru, H.
Venue
Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films
Published
1993-09-01
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
2816-2821
ISSN
  • 0734-2101
  • 1520-8559
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review