The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography at 1050 nm versus 800 nm in retinal pathologies: enhanced performance and choroidal penetration in cataract patients
Open accessAbstract
Frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT), based on an all-reflective high-speed InGaAs spectrometer, operating in the 1050 nm wavelength region for retinal diagnostics, enables high-speed, volumetric imaging of retinal pathologies with greater penetration into choroidal tissue is compared to conventional 800 nm three-dimensional (3-D) ophthalmic FD-OCT systems. Furthermore, the lower scattering at this wavelength significantly improves imaging performance in cataract patients, thereby widening the clinical applicability of ophthalmic OCT. The clinical performance of two spectrometer-based ophthalmic 3-D OCT systems compared in respect to their clinical performance, one operating at 800 nm with 150 nm bandwidth (approximately 3 microm effective axial resolution) and the other at 1050 nm with 70 nm bandwidth (approximately 7 microm effective axial resolution). Results achieved with 3-D OCT at 1050 nm reveal, for the first time, decisive improvements in image quality for patients with retinal pathologies and clinically significant cataract.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography
Drexler, W., Morgner, U., Ghanta, R. K., Kärtner, F. X., Schuman, J. S., & Fujimoto, J. G. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/86589 · Cited by 962
Self-citation
Cited by
State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography
DREXLER, W., & FUJIMOTO, J. (2008) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.07.005 · Cited by 906
Self-citationOptical coherence tomography – current and future applications
Adhi, M., & Duker, J. S. (2013) · Current Opinion in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/icu.0b013e32835f8bf8 · Cited by 567
Optical Coherence Tomography: History, Current Status, and Laboratory Work
Gabriele, M. L., Wollstein, G., Ishikawa, H., Kagemann, L., Xu, J., Folio, L. S., & Schuman, J. S. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6312 · Cited by 310
Optical coherence tomography – development, principles, applications
Fercher, A. F. (2010) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2009.11.002 · Cited by 259
White, T. L., Lewis, P., Hayes, S., Fergusson, J., Bell, J., Farinha, L., White, N. S., Pereira, L. V., & Meek, K. M. (2017) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.16-21358 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Považay, B., Hermann, B., Unterhuber, A., Hofer, B., Sattmann, H., Zeiler, F., Morgan, J. E., Falkner-Radler, C., Glittenberg, C., Blinder, S., & Drexler, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Optics
- Publisher
- SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 041211
- ISSN
- 1083-3668 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162626930
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography at 1050 nm versus 800 nm in retinal pathologies: enhanced performance and choroidal penetration in cataract patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1117/1.2773728
- The paper
- Považay, B., Hermann, B., Unterhuber, A., Hofer, B., Sattmann, H., Zeiler, F., Morgan, J. E., Falkner-Radler, C., Glittenberg, C., Blinder, S., & Drexler, W. (2007). Three-dimensional optical coherence tomography at 1050 nm versus 800 nm in retinal pathologies: enhanced performance and choroidal penetration in cataract patients. Journal of Biomedical Optics. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2773728
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.